Page 4 of 6 :

This project blog »

Project blogs

A Walk With Cosmo.

By: Rob Turner

Cosmo:

Walks once a day,

Can't remember where he buries his bones,

 large fury and 'Apricot' in colour,

and does not molt.

He is a standard poodle crossed with a golden retriever.

 

click to expand/collapse 

'The Dog Fight'.

[enlarge]
'The Dog Fight'.

'The Dog Fight'.

[enlarge]
'The Dog Fight'.

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

 The fight went in a circle. Sid is a formidable dog, but he did not hurt me.

[enlarge]
 The fight went in a circle. Sid is a formidable dog, but he did not hurt me.

# 31 [17 July 2009]

I think our stars must be badly aspected at the moment. (thats mine and Cosmo's)

I've got feckin tooth ache, Gordon Bennet, Jesus H Christ I've got tooth ache.

Cosmo was surrounded suddenly by about 4 dogs on the beach and it developed into a bit of a tear up with a Beagle. These make short work of foxes, and it must have mistaken Cosmo for a large yellow fox (retard) and it attacked Cosmo really bad. Do you remember Bjork attacked a cameraman in an airport, it was on the 10 o'clock news years back. This apparently was because she felt her child was in danger with all the Paparazzi in its face, so she took out a cameraman with a rush of protective adrenaline...some story here, I ran into this pack of dogs picked up this Beagle and threw it belly up, head height into the air. This stopped the fighting and we walked off, some woman came up wearing a wet suit and took her beagle away, she did not say a word. Cosmo later I discovered was bleeding from a bite on his ear and by the time we got home he was soaked in blood.

When were up the woods he also had a run in with Sid the Schnauzer, who charged 100 yards (ignoring his owners call to heal) to confront Cosmo, went all kind of flat and low and the inevitable happened as I expected, Sid was out for revenge over the chicken incident some while back now. I could hear his owner shouting out 'if he gets aggressive kick him hard'. Again I had to separate fighting dogs.

What's going on here, I am a responsible dog owner?

other news is my wild flower seeds are a disapointment, but some are growing in a bucket in my garden.

I am slightly frustrated as I had wanted to read more about Emile Durkhiem, and totemic societies, but that will have to wait. I have noticed over the years that interests and research for art is often truncated and goes in steps, with other stuff happening in between. The current example of this is my work with maps, been interested in maps for a several years now and have made about 4 large scale mosaics using maps as a theme. I will probably have to make a 5th one soon. This means picking up dormant map ideas (if I have any) and going back to maps. Over the years a body of map work has built up, just that it doesn't flow in a joined up line. This is a result of of working only on commissioned projects. I dont think there is anything wrong with this, only you can't strike while the iron is hot, if you see what I mean. Compared to gallery artists who can work in straight uninterrupted lines on their ideas, or can they? blogs show the same pattern due to commitments etc.

So totemic exploration will have to wait untill my 'little blue hut' residency later this year.

 

View comment icon View 1 comment »

Comments on this post

Love the dog fight story. Thanks for directing me to Graham Swain's blog.

posted on 2009-07-18 by Don Braisby

# 32 [23 July 2009]

It's one of those parralell walks, Cosmo's in his world and I'm in mine. Just following an unknown path in the woods. Paths in the woods are a bit like paths  in real life.

Feeling overwelmed, small, grumpy and anyoyed that I have got to answer the same old questions, those same old questions for every job application. You know the ones, those ones you can never answer because you dont know the answers, yet you've had to answer them loads and loads of times before.

'outline your ideas.... and how you might approach this..... and why are you interested..... how will you fulfill the aims....... how do you meet the person specifacation........outline relevant experiance and show evidence of interest in this project? 

I've gone all sulky and I'm walking in the woods saying..... Well...I dont know do I, because I've never been there have I, I havent met anyone there, I dont know how the dynamic between the stakeholders works, and I dont know what people living there think. I dont know whats interesting yet or how I'm going to do all the stuff you want to know. I'm not sure whats relevant and I think your person spec sounds like an administrative position and I dont know how to show you evidence of interest in this project either. Is'nt an application evidence of interest, what sort of questions that?

Now....do some peole who think in logical organised processes have generic systematic answers to all these questions and they apply a formula to cover the range of stuff required. Can they invent hypothesis and systems they are going to use, without knowing what they are going to use them on.

me.....I don't know how I'm going to do it, and when I write what I'm going to do, when I get there I might need to change it, as I can see a better way of doing it, as there are other intersting things i didnt know about before. But I can do it, I just cant tell you yet!

Not much good sending that.

So in the end you just write something and dont agonise over every paragraph cos who ever reads it does'nt know you agonised over it and you really tried hard to answer the questions and it took a day to choose the things you wanted to show them.

or

you just cut and paste from the last two or three applications you made, selected several nice photos and sent the whole thing off before 10.30 in the morning?

So what are the best questions to ask then?   oh .... It's allways about writing, it frustrates me and I'm not in the mood for it. Just get on with it and DO IT, anything, it does not matter, so what if it misses the target. Next time move he target and you might hit it.

These woodland paths widen, narrow, open out, take you to places you dont know, become impassable, lead you into sunny clearings, or go all bumpy. Metahors for life really.

The wild flower seeds I planted in a bucket.

[enlarge]
The wild flower seeds I planted in a bucket.

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

I dont think any seeds we planted in the woods have grown. But some seeds lay dorment for years dont they?

[enlarge]
I dont think any seeds we planted in the woods have grown. But some seeds lay dorment for years dont they?

# 33 [28 July 2009]

The Bird man of Alcatraz shows Bert Lancaster is a ‘lifer’ who gets up every day to tend his collection of birds; he feeds and nurtures them lovingly. He cures their illnesses and becomes an expert on them.

In a way I see this is a romantic parallel to the expected life of an artist with a ‘true practice’!

My wife says that my life as an artist has been more like the Great Escape. I have worked to commissioners briefs, tried to define my practice and jumped through more hoops than you can shake a stick at. But still working inside the defined parameters of the brief I have explored a huge range of areas of interest to me. I have emptied many many hidden bags of soil into the commissioner’s plans and schemes without them knowing, right under their noses.

These bags of soil from the hidden escape tunnel of my artistic ideas and values have been distributed all over the country. I have explored and researched new mediums, new materials, new subjects, colour schemes, ways of working and topics I’m really interested in, just the same as non commissioned artist investigations. The difference might be I have had to wait some time for the opportunity to follow on with a subject which had formed part of an earlier work. Over a period of years and years revisiting certain ideas or techniques builds a body of work in that area. If you have lots of these little ideas following their own pathways simultaneously then you are always ‘finding yourself’ as an artist even though you are working to a specific brief. My training as an artist taught me to follow ideas in a straight line. My working life post education has taught me to meander, wait, work with other people’s ideas, work with things you never expected you would ever think of and work quicker than perhaps you want to.

The constant pressure to define my practice is intimidating and the use of language used by those who want to potentialy work with me or know more about me is creative, but it does not make me feel confident or able to talk back and allow me to sound like I know what I am talking about. I am sure me and many artists want to work as artists within commerce, education, local government, services and industry. Are artists expected to converse in the same language, and if they can’t, is their work rubbish? I feel intimidated by this and worry that if my letter of application or my expression of interest doesn’t use their language or their kind of visioning, if my ideas are not razor sharp and clearly described to reveal some kind of Blofeldian master plan, that I must be below the standard they are looking for.

Perhaps if I could describe that I didn’t have a deliverable concept yet, in a clever enough way that would be good enough and they would take me seriously.

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

'Rob Turner'. My bucket of wild flower seeds is doing nicely, and visited by lady birds.

[enlarge]
'Rob Turner'. My bucket of wild flower seeds is doing nicely, and visited by lady birds.

# 34 [6 August 2009]

I've been feeling pants lately. I should'nt. I've got more work than I can keep up with and several oppotunities which look worth applying for. But I still feel rubbish, but did have a break through today. Drawings: my drawings are usually about, designing something to be made in a different material, showing some one else an idea or how to make something.

Todays drawings I did two of those three things, but  I was creating little worlds that I inhabited and walked around as if I were inside a model world.

The other thing I wanted to say was someone actually contacted me to paint a mural, did you hear that PAINT a MURAL. Not print something digital onto sheet materials, paint. Brushes favoured over spray cans.

The economics of painting a mural are problematic because you have to go there and do it day after day racking up pertol and labour costs. Is it really true a painting is viable in todays digital high speed world, does it have something other media dont have, thats worth paying for.

Painting, that is where it all started for me years back and I love it. Enough to work with teenagers and a site hoarding bloody miles away. Well we'll see?

Cosmo is a little too hot in this weather and he's booked in for a hair cut next Tue.

View comment icon View 3 comments »

Comments on this post

Seeds not doing well; tried some in the garden as it is pretty wild but obviously not the right kind of wild.

posted on 2009-08-13 by Clare Smith

Clare....Margate...........seeds...........audience note taking Clare? How are you. Where have you planted your seeds? I tried to sew my wild flower seeds in a ring around an oak tree in the woods. It has failed sadly. What you see is the remainder of the packet in a bucket in my back garden. Hope the Exeter thing goes well!

posted on 2009-08-08 by Rob Turner

Hi Rob Glad to see the Margate seeds are doing so well! Clare

posted on 2009-08-07 by Clare Smith

the woodland floor.

[enlarge]
the woodland floor.

the dreaming path

[enlarge]
the dreaming path

# 35 [12 August 2009]

I turned the mural job down. It was a long drive at the start and end of each working day. They were not going to include any expences outside the fee. I just thought I dont need to work that hard.

I have had my foot right hard down on the gas pedal for what seems 18 months or more even. You cant keep that pace up indefinately? I still have stuff to do but just with more time inbetween them.

Now, Cosmo has no problem with leisure and active time. He chills out during the day and makes the most of his active walk time.

I'm finding it hard to relax in the spare time. I should be reading, drawing, relaxing and reflecting on things. Reviewing my promotional material and approach, enjoying not working so hard.

But there is a little nagging feeling says 'you should be earning money, there's a recession on. You should ern all you can, you berk.

I think I'm punch drunk if you know what I mean! I am taking my lead from Cosmo and making an effort to chill out for fecks sake.

So here are a couple of drawings from todays Walk with Cosmo.

wild flowers

[enlarge]
wild flowers

wild flowers

[enlarge]
wild flowers

cornflower

[enlarge]
cornflower

my corn flower

[enlarge]
my corn flower

'I am the door'.A woodland path chosen by Cosmo.

[enlarge]
'I am the door'.A woodland path chosen by Cosmo.

# 36 [17 August 2009]

We got sort of half lost on today's walk. We walked through corn fields with hay bales in for a while, needed a bit of guess work, but never really that lost. I dont think Cosmo knew we were lost he was very exuberent.

Sometimes I try to test him to see if he knows the way? Oh..he makes out he does, boldly goes off in one direction. But then coincidentally discovers the trail of a squirell or rabbit which takes him on a long wide arc back to the junction where I let him decide which way. At this point he waits for me to either carry along the path he chose, or go back to the junction and pick a fresh one.

Now I noticed a blue flower in my wild flower bucket yesterday, turns out it is a corn flower. An endangered spieces. Named so because it's habitat is corn fields. But with modern farming techniques these 'weeds' are eradicated with chemicals, pesticides and stuff.

This is the first flower I have ever really grown. I have told other people to plant flowers and that, but I never really bonded with those flowers.

 

 

woodland path

[enlarge]
woodland path

woodland path

[enlarge]
woodland path

cornfields

[enlarge]
cornfields

# 37 [25 August 2009]

I dont have much to say but here are some dog walk drawings.

View comment icon View 2 comments »

Comments on this post

hi rob. thank you for the book reference. i'm up for discussing the intellectual snobbery you say you nearly rant about. my starting point is that for all the good within those practioners within fine art, being aware of 'how it is' they all have no voice in the wider societal context as their concerns are made so ambigous to dilute what they initially were concerned about. the intellectual snobbery is starting to self implode.

posted on 2009-08-27 by andrew martyn sugars

hi rob. thank you for the escher reference. would you happen to know what book i might find it in?

posted on 2009-08-26 by andrew martyn sugars

'A wise man.'. Courtesy: tinternet. The white man knows how to make everything. But he does not know how to distribute it.Sitting Bull

[enlarge]
'A wise man.'. Courtesy: tinternet. The white man knows how to make everything. But he does not know how to distribute it.Sitting Bull

# 38 [28 August 2009]

 On this question of artists explaining/conceptualising/justifing what they do by intelectual juggelery  to others. I am able to see it from a slightly different position because I can use time, looking back 20 years or more at this issue.

I remember being a recent graduate or emerging artist trying to establish their practice (how ever you want to describe it) and there has always been a focal issue as to why I'm not getting exhibitions/commissions/funding etc.

First it was that the art world was all about who you knew, not what you knew.

Then it was all about physical presentation of your work (I'm talking pre digital cameras). Could'nt afford to produce expensive laminated folders with printed inserted information sheets. How good were your slides?

Then it was websites did you have one yet, it showed some kind of status? Even though it did not portray you as you wanted to be seen.

Now it's this issue of how you think? Is it clever enough, critical, conceptual. The language has to be right. All these things are really just things to be cross about if you did'nt get what you wanted.

TIME is the key to all this anxiety. Its much easier to look back at a body of work which may have taken two years, more to accumulate after leaving collage. Look back after time and its is easier to see what you did and why you did it. The complex issues in everyones lives prevents the creation of artworks but artworks still come out. They take longer and have limitations. These limitations shape the type of work that is made. Half a garden shed or the kitchen table forces a type of work, as does only a computer.

The other thing is that: 'The Work' plus 'Something Else' is what may edge that funding or commission. What that 'something else is' is not nessacerily how good you are at writing conceptual critical intelectual justifaction for your work. It may be that you have completed a substancial body of work and documented it well so you can present it clearly to interested people. Which is a totally different thing.

I am trying to help when I say Rome was'nt built in a day. The last thing I was going to say is I think artists are made by the lives they live, not what they were taught in collage.

View comment icon View 21 comments »

Comments on this post

Claire its great to understand what people find interesting, just basic feed back about what you do and thanks for grounding me again. I think andrew has picked up on your comment about different types of thinking while making and preparing or writing stuff etc. I think that will generate the content of my my next post. Pointing and preteding to know as David says is something I have to hold my hands up and admit guilt.

posted on 2009-09-12 by Rob Turner

Rob When people ridicule things by referring to what supposedly immature beings can do, they simply demonstrate a lack of sympathy for reasoned argument. I suspect that the same people would argue that the 11+ is a good idea. We might as well believe that given enough monkeys and typewriters, one of them would write King Lear. Gardner’s, speculation about ‘intelligences’ is just that. Although Gardner may not have intended it in his work, the notion of intelligence is loaded with connotations of status. It’s one of those words which points to something and pretends to know what it is. It also helps justify separating out the ‘monkeys’ and putting them in with the typewriters.

posted on 2009-09-11 by David Minton

Freud's case study 'Little Hans' is a story about a boy who needed to have a theory, even if it made no sense, he needed to have one because it enabled him to master his fears. Do you think there is a difference between thinking through language (words) and thinking through making? I would say there is. When you make things you can think things you would never think by just thinking.

posted on 2009-09-11 by Andrew Bryant

Hi again At the risk of thrashing this one to death, I'm still not sure why in the context of art practice we keep splitting thinking and making or making and thinking or living and thinking ... or writing and thinking or even writing and making. Going shopping isn't cooking but generally you have to do that first before cooking a great meal. Anyhow, I love the Walking with Cosmo blog and wish that I too could walk and reflect generally when out walking my own dog. I can't because he is a bouncy labrador that thinks he's a spaniel and is pretty uncontrollable at the moment despite hours of training! So when reading this blog, I imagine walks I might make.

posted on 2009-09-11 by Clare Smith

David, thats funny about Howard Gardener, as I rather liked the cut of his jib. His theories explained my shortcomings and made me feel more confident about my own abilities. Failing my 11+ I felt I was on a garbage heap and had missed a ticket to a grown up life with opportunities for great things. You could also argue that for the general public, art which is particularly academic is the kind of art that gives art a bad name! You know when people say to you, ' my nephew could have done that and he's not even nine yet'. I do remember replying to this by saying, 'yeh could he sell it for 35 grand though'?

posted on 2009-09-10 by Rob Turner

Rob, your reference to Howard Gardner is interesting, in that he was criticised by his peers for the arbitrariness of his categories and use of the term ’intelligence’. His work is arguably the kind of academicism that gets the academic a bad name.

posted on 2009-09-10 by David Minton

Now thats a really interesting one Kirsty, cos it lands right in my court: I only ever apply for work that has a budget attached to it. I have spent my whole career. working to publicly funded commissions, I have done this full time for 20 years. And your right my practice when I left collage used to be painting is totally redundant. I can't tell if this is natural development of my practice as an artist, or out and out mercenary behaviour. The renaisence workshops worked to patron commissions, and yet they transend that mercenary label, but that is what they are 'guns for hire'. But I have earned a living, brought up a family (my wife included of course who has more than pulled her weight) and 'I have lived a life' had a few bumpy rides and really enjoyed every commisssion. This blog walking with cosmo is really about my inner world which is not paid for by someone else and anything in here is unpaid and me looking at my inspirations out side of earning money.

posted on 2009-09-10 by Rob Turner

I'm sorry that I gave the impression that I was 'anti-academic', Andrew. I'm not - although I do have issues with some of the language used to describe art. I think there's a huge amount of value in writing, reading about art and going to private views. As a working artist, I do all those things all the time and I'm currently considering going back to do an MA. But what I was trying to get across is that it's just PART of making the work NOT a substitute for it. It doesn't matter how good you are at writing funding proposals if your own practice has ground to a halt. I often meet artists who are so consumed by all that stuff that they hardly seem to make work any more.

posted on 2009-09-10 by Kirsty Hall

David, yes I agree spades are spades as it were. Are we asking if it is poor, good, or exellent spade. Like a rubber one may be poor. A shovel or a spade for moving loose materials? Then the shovel would be exellent. Quality the is watch word. How do you measure that one ? By asking the gardeners with hands on experience, a scientist, or a manfacturer of spades, a philoshoper, or a dragons den celebrity. Help? Interesting about the class system emerging there, grammer schools and tech collages. Ken Robinson says academic intellegence is only one kind of intellegence. Howard Gardener tell us there are 7-8 different catorgries of intelegence. and in our make up we all have different combinations of these.

posted on 2009-09-10 by Rob Turner

Being and doing. Whatever it is it can be done well or badly. There is no real split between the academic and whatever else (the practical?) There are only different kinds of practise. This academic problem seems to come from underlying class issues –clever people think, practical people ‘make’. But it is based upon a (sometimes wilful) lack of insight into the intelligence of ‘making’. Bridges, houses, music, ideas, all have to be well crafted if they are to make sense. Tosh is tosh whether it’s in the brain or on the wall. The difficult bit is understanding what is in front of you.

posted on 2009-09-10 by David Minton

hi Clare, What do accademics do ....travel to meetings all day ? In the words of Ken Robinson 'carry their heads to meetings' He has some interesting things to say by the way. Heres the thing; when you have passed your driving test you only then really start to learn how to drive by negotiating and expeirencing the jungle out there. Are we talking about different driving styles here. A driver who applies to the highway code, or one who makes instinctive decissions. No I think the word vocation is what this dissucussion is playing ping pong with.

posted on 2009-09-10 by Rob Turner

Doing an MA, going to private views, running arts projects, working in the studio, thinking about ideas and talking about them - all of that is life for me and makes up my life as an artist and is about making art. An academic life is a life or should one say that a life that includes academic thought is not not a life.

posted on 2009-09-10 by Clare Smith

Ah....I see exactley what you mean now. Does it look like artists are the only 'real people' with things to say? Which is a bit of an artish thing to imply! Or feeling insecure in one group and wanting to belong to a different group with more common views? There are 'ANTI ART WORLDS' and there are anti art worlds. I'm not 'ANTI ACADEMIA' but anti academic in the way I do stuff. I dont know if you ever read Zen and the art of Motorcycle Maintenance. (put it on the MA reading list). Is this the classic / romantic split in personality types identified by the author? My mental powers fall short of answering how these approches meet and cross over. I can only associate them together, with this analogy. Some peoples make up may place them 50/50 in each side. I might even describe myself as a romantic classic or of 35-65 split, or this is complete rubbish. either way, its nice to have people me blog.

posted on 2009-09-09 by Rob Turner

I was really referring specifically to Anthony "What I did in college, apart from a few key ideas, bares no resemblence to what I have done since..", Kirsty "Having a studio, going to private views, talking about art online or filling out funding forms doesn't make someone an artist..", and Susan's refusal to do an MA, all of which combined seems to suggest an 'anti-academia' and 'anti-art world' sentiment in favour of a notion of the 'artist as real person'. I am suggesting that the two 'worlds' are perhaps not mutually exclusive...

posted on 2009-09-09 by Andrew Bryant

Being out there talking/writing about art is living and working. Do you mean that the conversations had are art? I guess that depends on how they are recorded and presented!

posted on 2009-09-08 by Rob Turner

Do MAs, private views and talking about art really preclude 'living and working'...?

posted on 2009-09-08 by Andrew Bryant

Reading thoughts like this, unfettered by the constraints of adhering to the current acceptable language of critical justification, - real thoughts - is what makes the interaction on these blogs so valuable. Looking around, I barely see anyone exhibiting who hasn't an MA after their name and yet I refuse to sign up for one (I've declined offers twice) unless I am convinced it will make a contribution to my work that cannot be gained through living and working.

posted on 2009-09-04 by Susan Francis

I love that line about artists being made by the lives they live.

posted on 2009-09-01 by Clare Smith

Rob, Totally agree. I have made a couple of references to this post in my latest post.

posted on 2009-08-28 by David Minton

I totally agree with your point about how we live our lives. Having a studio, going to private views, talking about art online or filling out funding forms doesn't make someone an artist (although all those things are often part of a contemporary artist's life) - making art is what makes someone an artist!

posted on 2009-08-28 by Kirsty Hall

Could not agree more. What I did in college, apart from a few key ideas, bares no resemblence to what I have done since. It is about the artist too, who we are, the whole thing. Life itself is our art. I try to just do what I do.

posted on 2009-08-28 by Anthony Boswell

Scandinavia as it is at the moment.

[enlarge]
Scandinavia as it is at the moment.

coloured pencil.

[enlarge]
coloured pencil.

Rob Turner

[enlarge]

# 39 [9 September 2009]

These are some of the places I walk with Cosmo. They need new maps because preparation for the arrival of the cattle has changed the woodland alot. 'Scandinavia' is almost unrecoisable now. 

# 40 [13 September 2009]

Thinking in words or language and thinking through making?

Have you noticed how Andrew Bryant drops these little incedurary devices into peoples blogs? (Not a critisism Andrew, an observation) made me think hard.

 But can I just say: I thought about 'Little Hans' on the walk with Cosmo this evening and I dont believe 'Little Hans' needed the theory I think Sigmund Freud needed it! 

Different types of thinking.

Claire says its joined up and the result is a finished creation, with which I agree ....and thinking when making is definatley different from other stages in the process.  

'Thinking through making' does that actually make sence? Thinking whilst making does. Thinking when making is often a tactile thing...what consistacy is the cement.. too stiff? How much preasure is required to bend that...not enough pull it harder.. how dry is that now and how dry will it be in about 10 minutes? physical repsonces not words. Some kind of technical tacit knowladge is gained and automatic in its delivery. Testing things to see if they do what you want is what goes on.

Thinking before making, 'designing' is just pretty free-form in its conection from one thing to another to form ideas. It is a visual way of thinking using an eye that works in your head to produce relevant visuals but some about using words as well. Does it really become about words when you need to explain to someone else what your going to do. If you dont have to justify what your doing to anyone the language part never gets developed as the creator does not need to sharpen it, they can work with their instincts and intuition?

Another thing is: does language develop your ideas and take them further?  yes I'm sure it does, but I think what really develops ideas are new experiences. Once you've perfected your language about what you do, time has gone by and you want to do something different and your stuck with your  mantra.   Change, new things, stimulas these are the things which create ideas.

Why did Marc Rothco commit suicide? Was it because he was forced  to paint Marc Rothco's all the time?

Sorry if I'm rambling, it was an extra long dog walk this evening. To Cosmo's benifit if no one else's.

View comment icon View 2 comments »

Comments on this post

Hi Emily, I have two or three times been told that my expression of interest or statement was 'too generic'. So I figure there is only really one way to do these things, and that is write something new every time, as most applications want something about your ideas or reaction etc. Its all very time consuming and sometimes I take it really seriously (like it matters), and other times I am rather throw away about it. Both have often failed and both have also yielded results. So I guess its as openended as art itself? I find it hard to write about my ideas, after the amount of times I've done it you would think I'd have got the hang of it by now. I hate it.

posted on 2009-09-22 by Rob Turner

That comment about time going by and being stuck with your mantra, I think that can be true. I sometimes feel like there is pressure to be understandable from the outside, like a neat package that you can see all the ingredients of. This means that I write statements (these help me understand what I am doing too of course!) and then I think I should update my statement all the time, but I don't. These days my statement is left fairly vague so I have plenty of room to shift about and still make some kind of sense (to myself I do at least). I love the language bits and I am very interested in writing, but sometimes it makes me question everything to the point of paralysis and I think it's better for me to make first, write later.

posted on 2009-09-14 by Emily Speed

Page 4 of 6 :

This project blog »

Rob Turner

Cosmo is a 'Golden Doodle' and well, this it is the most important part of his day and we share it together.

I am a  visual artist who walks with Cosmo every day, rain or shine. This is the only time I have to just let my thoughts go where they want and reflect on things.

rob-turner.blogspot.com/