Page 3 of 4 :

This project blog »

Bookmarks

Feedback Feedback

Inappropriate material?
Ideas? Technical issues?
» Feedback to a-n

Project blogs

Keeping it going

By: Christina Bryant

I've decided to continue with my blogging activities on a-n.

I want to continue building on the progress made last year and keep the momentum up. Blogging it seems to help me question and evaluate each new experience.

click to expand/collapse 

# 18 [18 May 2009]

I’m having trouble writing this morning. I barred myself from checking blogs and emails over the weekend because by the end of last week I had started to feel odd about this online world. Sometimes I struggle to get my head round it. I remember when I started to use Facebook worried I was missing out on something. I began wary of the alien space, and then got really into it, then realised I was checking it obsessively and felt it was warping my sense of reality. Subsequently, I left (although was pretty annoyed that I couldn’t delete my profile but could only disable it). Friday I started to consider how I feel about this online blog space. I read Alex Pearl’s description of what he got out of it and even though it was all very positive I felt deflated reading it. Also last week in a discussion with an artist friend she mentioned agenda and that when reading anything you should consider the writers agenda. Then this morning I read David Minton’s latest post and couldn’t bring myself to write the regular weekly update that I normally do. If as a writer I always have an agenda how can it be untangled in faceless exchanges that solely exist as words? In some ways for me it makes me feel more isolated, more anxious, and more vulnerable than in physical reality. David talks about trusting each other but I don’t understand how you can trust such an obscure world. It seems impossible not to be anxious about being misinterpreted, especially as your whole online identity is based on what you say. It’s quite intense to me but it has made me do a lot of thinking and questioning. That's why I still do it.

 

I too feel there is an element of courage that I have to find to click ‘publish’ at the end of a post.  Gulp.      

View comment icon View 1 comment »

Comments on this post

Hi Christina. Yes, I understand your comments. When I thought about starting this blog, it was scary too and I was the same about my own personal blog. It makes me feel exposed to everyone, but then I think all new relationships are about discovering a new place. I just hope as artists, as well as ordinary people, we maybe have a seperate world we can all understand. My blog here is going to become a physical part of my show, and it is useful to look back on as a personal diary. Yet would we want to share a personal diary? I hope it all helps someone else along the way too. I can see how it could run away with you, become a fix, so I am using it only when it is constructive. Going to click that publish button before I ramble on.

posted on 2009-05-18 by Anthony Boswell

# 17 [11 May 2009]

Last week was a bit of a non-week in terms of art work. I did over-time at work, was babysitting my niece and finishing the decorating. After all this I was only left one day at the studio and by the end of the week found myself getting a bit itchy about my absence. So this week I’m hoping to scratch that itch and get back down to it.

 

11 weeks until the show which seems ages or maybe not. It’s very hard to gauge time scales. How long will it take me to sew another two houses, get some prints done, finish a drawing, make a performance house and tend to any other last minute issues and decisions? How long is a piece of string? I guess the point will come that I just have to stop and put up and say this is were I am at right now. If I had ten years or ten days it would just be a different stop off point.    

View comment icon View 2 comments »

Comments on this post

Hi Andrew, thanks for your comment. No, no relation...as far as I know! Yes, the ma thing. When I finished my ba I felt institutionalised to the max. I was terrified about real life, feeling that it meant a loss of freedom for my art and no excuse to carry on doing it. I couldn't see how it could exist outside of a course, without the system. If I am not working for a grade, what am I working for? Doing an ma at this point would have only been an attempt to delay facing reality and a complete waste of my time. But having been out of uni for 5 years I now can see that real life has helped my practice grow differently and given me a wider perspective on what i want from my practice. I feel I can re-enter the art college now and use it as a tool for progression rather than a 'prop up' for my practice. I definitely don't think doing an ma (or even a ba) is essential at all though. Artists are so diverse and some practices just don't thrive in that environment. I am very against the pressure on artists to fit the right mould, the wonderful thing is we don't need to be anything fixed. Blimey, I've gone on a bit! So why the questioning of this? Are you contemplating whether to do one or do you think rather it's not for you?

posted on 2009-05-18 by Christina Bryant

hi christina i've been pointed at your blog by andrew, wow, what a coincidence-you have the same surnames. is there a family connection at all ? with andrew i've been throwing back and forth the notions of why do an ma and subsequently is there to much over intellectualisation in art. oh and flippantly, twice the distance from the centre. i'll pop back soon to try and get a feel for what you are doing.

posted on 2009-05-15 by andrew martyn sugars

# 16 [3 May 2009]

It has been a fairly productive week. I have felt quite invigorated turning up at the studio each morning with a clear set of tasks before me. You could say just a little too invigorated maybe… I have noticed that my stuff seems to be growing quite out of control. I have a fair sized space and probably if I was a more organised, less erratic worker, it would be ample for me to operate within without this involuntary sprawl.  But for some reason when in the midst of working out some idea my brain can’t seem to operate in an orderly fashion. Suddenly I find myself out in the corridor, lying across the walkway trying something new around something old, tripping over some stray piece of wire or an old bit of work. I push things clumsily out the way, squash little wire doors with my clumsy feet, traipse accidental footprints on my stray notepaper and sketches, tea gets cold and lunch gets eaten about 3 hours after a traditional lunching time. It is a bit like I forget that I am there; forget that the body needs manoeuvring with at least a little bit of care and also does require a bit of food and water at times. There is definitely a touch of frantic in the way I work.

 

The meeting about the Hertford studios last week has still left a lot of uncertainties. Mainly because it is not built yet and therefore it feels impossible to really know what a space in it would be like. Things are pretty fluid and changeable at this stage. Saying this however, I have come to the decision that I will take a calculated risk and get involved and keep an option in the future. However, it has been agreed that I won’t make a final decision until I have viewed a building that exists and my deposit can be refunded if it is just unworkable. There is real potential for the project though and a great chance for an art community to establish itself. The woman setting it up has a genuine passion for seeing it a success. I really admire her for taking on such a task. The space will be cheaper than what I am paying now but subsequently much smaller…hence my way of working possibly being problematic. However, I comfort myself (and maybe other artists who may now be feeling unsure about sharing a space with such a menace as the one described above) by remembering the tiniest of space I had at uni and I managed. I am hoping that my practice has just grown to fit the space available and therefore maybe persuaded to be reversed and shrunk down a little.  I guess we just do what we can with the space we’ve got. It might be time to start exploring the world of miniatures!       

Christina Bryant.

[enlarge]
Christina Bryant.

# 15 [28 April 2009]

Statement is done; Amisha sent me the proof of the invite to look over, which was quite exciting. I couldn’t decide on which image to use so sent a few for her to choose from. She went for the one of me performing - I had a feeling she would.

 

I find I have a number of different things on the go now and not sure exactly where some of them are going but I am enjoying working in this way and letting one idea feed off of another. Having this coming up has really helped me to focus on the different threads in my practice and follow some that I have only toyed with in the past. It seems like a good time to reflect on my practice as a whole but fortunately doesn’t allow me a chance to get too diverted or confused, I know I must just keep hard at it and stay focused, as well as keep a little faith. I feel like I am just skimming the surface of confusion and bafflement as a survival mechanism now (time for all that later)…. For now just keep making, keep exploring and keep focusing on the ideas but don’t try to resolve. I am really excited just trying things out. It feels like such a luxury!

 

Tonight I’m going to a meeting over in Hertford about the proposed studios. I hope this goes well. I feel very excited about meeting some of the other artists that are getting involved and looking forward to seeing things move forward. High hopes are risky but I still can’t help but have them!

# 14 [18 April 2009]

Another week has sped by and what have I been up to? I worked the bank holiday over at another shop in Hatfield. Joy, oh joy! But it’s a job at least. (restrain the full moan!)

 

The rest of the week for some reason, I’m finding it hard to recall, it has gone so quickly. I have been working on the drawing on and off but have been combining it with other more pressing tasks - like my personal statement. I find I have a strange relationship with the activity of statement writing. Sometimes I feel a slight resentment at having to constantly be writing, rewriting, searching for words that sum up and justify a whole ever changing practice. Other times it feels like a really useful reflection and reassessment of things. But for some reason the words of the curator of the C4RD gallery come back to me when I sit down to start one… ‘Artist’s usually aren’t good at writing about their work’.  Are we the best people to be explaining our own work? I don’t think it’s out of laziness that I sometimes don’t feel it appropriate to write bumf of text (my sketch book is filled with pages of notes) I like writing… I like writing this blog and reflect constantly, but I hate writing something that accompanies a piece of work and could be taken as fact. The word 'statement' sounds very final and official. I don’t know maybe I'm just thinking too much about it. What does everyone else think about this? Do we read, write and value statements and explanations? I just know, like my statements, my opinion of them is ever changing.

 

Well anyway, I have almost got there with the statement - as much as I can at this point in time. By the time the exhibition comes round though I will probably be feeling quite uncomfortable about my stated claims, so please don’t take anything I write as concrete. It is all subject to change!

 

I did also last week go and find out more about a proposed plan for a new studio group in Hertford. It looks positive, although very early days so I’m not packing my bags just yet, but it does seem to have potential. Fingers crossed on that one and plenty more to find out.

 

View comment icon View 11 comments »

Comments on this post

I feel that there are several strands to this debate. My major difficulty is in separating them. The relationship between artworks and 'explanation', betwween critic and artist is fraught with difficulty. The language that we use constructs the meaning of what we are trying to say. All meanings are contextual. Language provides a means to approach what might be said. Artworks exist in relation to each other and to their audience; there is a rationale. The language of debate allows us to point to possibilities. Ultimately I cannot know anything;language keeps open the possibility that I might get closer. Nonsense can be grammatically correct, however, and we have to clarify what we are discussing. Always in the background is the escape route that we are all entitled to our own point of view.Yes we can like what we like but unless we wish to make the case we must remain silent. If we simply allow the notion of entitlement to our own view, nothing can be said;we talk into mirrors and Matisse has the same value as Tretchikoff. Our words may not be capable of precision, but can support a sense of direction. It is the imprecision of language that provides opportunities for refinement of argument and creative insight.If we feel that what any particular artist/critic/curator argues is meaningless/nonsense we can protest all we like. We still have to make a reasoned case?

posted on 2009-05-12 by David Minton

Yeah I know what you mean Rob, I am often left scratching my head and trying to fathom the 'true' meaning of words. There is the same room for error and misinterpretation with text I'm sure, especially quotes because they are purposefully so elusive. I do love the obscure in language though. I once heard a discussion on radio 4 about metaphors and poetry and was so taken with how the process had such a similarity to visual art. I had never considered how open to discovery words could be. I think when you take away the assumption of certainty and fact words possibly aren't so constricting. However my feelings are that words are used often to strengthen stereo types and weaken confidence. Maybe that is an over generalisation? (you see, for me words have a habit of doing that, they make me worry I've said the wrong thing!)

posted on 2009-05-08 by Christina Bryant

See now I dont get that? A Life does speak. Ones life looked back over does collectivley speak for the individual you lived it? Life as a thing generaly, which waits and listens.....does not compute ........error. Or is it like a bag waiting to get filled up? Interpretation: words are suposed to be precise and no room for error in understanding, unless you deliberatly use them in a blurred way, so interprettation comes in! Which is what I need when reading these works by accademics and thinkers.

posted on 2009-05-07 by Rob Turner

Christina, you put it brilliantly, a life without words, a culture without words... in a way perhaps this is what many visual artists are sort of getting at... Apparently there was a Native American tribe who changed the words for things on a regular basis, so that with each new year everything had a new name... For Derrida, meaning was always deferred; it sort of hovered between words. And this is a quote from Deleuze and Guattari's A Thousand Plateaus: "Life does not speak; it listens and waits."

posted on 2009-05-04 by Andrew Bryant

Andrew, you do have a way with words and a very good ability to analyze and articulate some very interesting points (presumably why you are an editor and an artist). Being a master of words is a real plus in this society for the reasons you mentioned and I agree with what you say. Words (or a lack of them) have an acute power to cripple and cause a feeling of inadequacy. We are all judged on what words we can contribute and it seems in the art world there is a lot of pumped up, over intellectualized speak to contend with (usually if it sounds good it must be true). I guess being an artist, one is expected to be able to demonstrate through the language of words, to back up and validate and prove themselves worthy of the role. Nobody likes to feel that they are being had for a fool or not understanding 'correctly' and need the authority of words to reassure them. I feel I often struggle with words for that exact reason though, they make me feel pressured to be certain and conclude (as well as be correct). It's a very interesting debate. I wonder what the outcome would be without such emphasis on words?

posted on 2009-05-01 by Christina Bryant

Something that comes up in my mind when you ask this question Rob is that most of the people that hold the purse strings are rationalists. They are people of their time, a legacy of the enlightenment project, bourgeois bureaucrats, pen-pushers (or mouse movers nowadays). The trouble is we, as a culture, believe too much in words. It's Decartes' fault, he started it, "I think therefore I am", rational enquiry is the only way to the truth, and out of this came the sciences, industry, commerce, the media and all the rest of the bullshit. The cracks are showing though. There is a noticeable shift in peoples' perceptions, we aren't quite so sure any more, and all this rationalism is relatively recent in terms of human history, so maybe it will give way again in the future to a more free-thinking, open, speculative culture. It's all about mastery isn't it? Words make us feel like we are in control when we speak or write them. We think that we inscribe ourselves into the world when we speak when in fact words inscribe us. Derrida called it 'logocentrism' and attacked it vehemently, Foucault is all about the power structures inherent in language, Freud and Lacan talk about language as the sight of trauma - particularly Lacan and Kafka's short story 'In the Penal Colony' is a brilliant indictment of the problem. Deleuze has written a lot about it too, he says words are not life, they give a command to life. Us visual artists are able to admit our vulnerability and our uncertainty. We all know that you can't make art from a place of certainty. Words give the illusion of certainty. Unfortunately we have to play along, to pretend that we are certain about our work when the only thing we can be sure of is our uncertainty. And that's what is so good about art, we can live within and from our uncertainty.

posted on 2009-04-30 by Andrew Bryant

Are our Dancers, Musicans, Film Makers, Play Writes, Architects and Designers etc expected to conceptualise and justify what they do by explaning underlining philosophies to the same levels as expected of artists? Or am I just feeling persecuted? Is it about the writen word being more important that the dance, the sculpture, the building. Andrew can you tell us why Text, why is it that we are made to feel that it is so important. Often not always, artists are artists because they are not special with analytical powers and writing skills, their talents are communication in other ways thats kind of the point. measurement by writing ability: I would have writen a play or a poem if thats wat I wanted to do. All said and done though is easier to have clear understandings about what you do if your in competion with others. Is that the point? Help.

posted on 2009-04-28 by Rob Turner

Usually the only way to get myself through doubtful or blank periods is to try and push all my anxieties to the back of my mind and get as playful as possible. I try to forget expectations (my own or others) and what I might think I want to produce and just do for a while. Sometimes by doing the most unlikely thing or something I think is a little ridiculous can make surprises come my way and help me to start on the ascent. I tend to think best whilst manipulating something or another and not when I especially sit down with the purpose of working it out. Usually the things that I've thought about before I act disappoint me, where as the seed of an idea that is triggered by playing seems usually to hold more potential for progress and be much more 'alive'. I don't really know though, my practice still seems such a mystery to me. I too am starting an MA this September and feel so excited about having that time to focus and challenge my process and I guess, get to know it all better. I kind of feel though that it will probably always be obscure to me, something I will never be able to look at directly and get a clear view of but will be forever chasing round corners. The fleeting moments of some apparent 'clarity' are pretty exciting though!

posted on 2009-04-22 by Christina Bryant

I know what you mean about your relationship to your practice going in cycles. I find I really lock myself out of my own work much too often, and it is usually because of self-doubt or something like that. I seem to just have to ride it out. I'm starting an MA in September, full time, and I am hoping this will help me to get the momentum going and really get to grips with what it is I am after in my work. What do you do to cope when you find yourself blocked?

posted on 2009-04-22 by Andrew Bryant

Thanks Andrew, that is very helpful advice. You are very right about the process of writing being something that seems to move towards an explanation and search for answers. I guess that's why sometimes it feels so laboured and at others much more natural. I find that my relationship with my own practice works a lot in cycles, going from times of intense enthusiasm, productivity and a certain clarity, to other times more bewildered, confused and doubtful, for a large portion of the time I am just so far away from anything remotely like answers or conclusions. When I write a statement I probably do fall back into certain 'comfortable' habits that I've built up over the years. I think it would be really useful for me to reassess the statement process, like you say, looking at others is a good start. Cheers x

posted on 2009-04-19 by Christina Bryant

I sympathize with you about the difficulty in writing about your work, Christina. Writing is, I think, a process that moves towards solutions, answers, explanations, as if the words will finish the job by filling the gaps that the work leaves open. Making and writing are such different processes aren't they. Have you tried reading what other artists say about their work? Sometimes this can be helpful because you can steal bits for yourself, or you can use what others say to make a counter argument. If you haven't already I would try and see what some of the artists you admire say about their work. Sometimes even artists you don't particularly like can throw up gems. Gerhardt Richter writes very interestingly about his work and without recourse to meta-discourses, so does Francis Bacon in his interviews with David Sylvester. Bacon is very humble, often talking about what he wants to achieve rather than what he has done and, by his own harsh judgment, he usually believes himself to have failed. I would say read as much as you can of artists in their own words, and think about what you want to achieve in your work, not just what the work is 'about'. And don't forget you are the biggest authority on your work.

posted on 2009-04-19 by Andrew Bryant

# 13 [11 April 2009]

This week has mostly been spent away from the studio; I was working on my installation drawing on Tuesday. So far, all seems to be coming together quite successfully (dare I even suggest smoothly? argh….not yet!!!) I’m enjoying seeing it come together though, especially as it feels a little like I’m working it all out as I go along. Each time I approach one of these drawings I start by scratching my head, and um-ing rather a lot, trying to recall how I even start. Like beginning anything it involves me staring at a blank white wall feeling the weight of emptiness.

 

Wednesday I spent the day in London with Quintin. It felt wonderful having set aside this whole day for seeing art and being together. We started the day at the Roni Horn exhibition at the Tate Modern. We spent ages here, and especially lingered in the room with the photos of the Thames and the glass cast. I came out deep in contemplation and provoked in thought. I am fascinated by how she made me feel about what I already know but never really recognised. I was reading an article by Hilary Mantel on the train down about wonderfully interesting books and how when she reads something really interesting it is like someone articulating thoughts she had never known how to articulate before. I guess seeing a good exhibition kind of does the same, you come out brimming with what feels to me like more of an understanding and more questions about yourself. We then went round the Rodchenko and Popova- Defining Constructivism. A complete contrast to what we had just seen, but knowing so little about this movement when I went in, I felt I came out the other side with an enthusiasm to find out more. After lunch we went over to the Hayward to see Mark Wallinger’s exhibition ‘The Russian Linesman’ and got a bonus as our ticket took us in to the Annette Messager exhibition. This was an unexpected treat. I knew nothing of her work before but loved it. It was very dark, bizarre and horrific. It was like being trapped in someone else’s disturbed yet strangely playful mind.

 

The rest of the week was spent doing family stuff, with a bit of decorating. Finally I could afford sometime to lend Q a hand around the house. Next week I plan to get myself back to studio work.      

View comment icon View 1 comment »

Comments on this post

Hello Christina, thank you for your comment on my blog ages ago. I am terrible at getting round to things I really should do. I just read your blog and found it a very interesting read. I've seen your work twice, at Particles Particles and Not On White Paper. I didn't see the performance, the opening was on my birthday but I have seen the small white house and find it very intriguing. I like how it is quite a portrait of an opening, and the interactivity of it is interesting too. I like what it does to the act of drawing as well, you become by doing that performance a mediator, letting the viewers draw through you really. The chairs piece was great as well, really liked that. It is strange, I really didn't like the Annette Messager show, it just fell completely flat for me, perhaps that was the company I was with. I decided not to read any of the blurb with the show to see how that might affect it. I too knew nothing of her work prior to the exhibition and I can't say that I liked it, I can see how it might become very atmospheric, but I think I was in the wrong mood for that show. The corridor in The Russian Linesman though, that was great. I imagine you liked the Fred Sanback's too? I am waffling now, but yes, the purpose of this comment was mainly a hello and letting you know that I like your work and blog.

posted on 2009-04-13 by Tom Duggan

# 12 [4 April 2009]

I did have a decent amount of time in the studio this week but strangely didn’t feel as productive as I thought I might. I have so much to be getting on with and have a clear idea of the steps I need to be taking to get things progressing, yet for some reason the brain didn’t really feel like engaging with the tasks. It’s frustrating to have a bad mood come along and disable my productivity for a good few days. Friday I sort of managed to shake it off enough to make some progress but I felt annoyed at myself for wasting so much time floating around with a vacant head on. Where did it come from?

 

Now it’s Saturday and I’m back at the gallery working. We are having a closing down sale; the inevitable is happening and what will happen to my job after the end of April -who knows! Like always with this job I’m keeping my head down, my fingers crossed and hoping for the best. I need it more than I am admitting to myself really. It is my only steady income and allows things to tick over (although admittedly only just).

 

I have also this week started looking into studios available around this area and this has been another thing that has darkened my mood. There seems to be so little on offer. I really want to remain part of a studio group rather than working in an isolated space. I still have a year left at Digswell Arts Trust but am aware of how hard it is to find a good place to work and am trying to be prepared. Instead it is just leaving me a little despondent. Basically, I am not going to be able to afford anything and if there is some little diamond place out there at an affordable price, will I ever find it? How will I survive without a place to work? I have got the 2 year MA course due to start in September and all the cost of that. Even if I do get the funding it’s going to be expensive, so much uncertainty….blah, blah, blah. I will stop now; it would appear I’m currently only in the mood to see problems and negatives. I hope to write a much more positive post soon.  

 

I am very grateful for having a place to spill out my anxieties and was lightened up this morning by a good read of  other recent posts. I find myself addicted to checking fellow bloggers updates and finding out how they are getting on. It has given me a real valuable insight into how other artists manage the everyday reality of being an artist.

'Floor plan'. A first draft floor plan for the layout of the Margaret Harvey Gallery for my solo show.

[enlarge]
'Floor plan'. A first draft floor plan for the layout of the Margaret Harvey Gallery for my solo show.

# 11 [29 March 2009]

I am so excited at the moment about the things going on with my practice and the changes ahead. I love looking ahead to things, feeling a certain amount of pressure and having plans. On Tuesday I went along to the Margaret Harvey Gallery to meet up with Matthew and Amisha, the curators at the gallery and Mark the technician to talk through the ideas, plans and dates. It was a good meeting and I have come away feeling very excited about working with them. They have each been very encouraging and supportive. This has made me feel much more composed about having a solo exhibition compared to the constant feeling of doom that hung over me leading up to the Red Gate last year.   

 

This bit of the early planning is the hardest because things are still so open and changeable. I guess as time goes along and the date gets closer then things have to get more and more specific.  For now however, I am trying not to go down that mental trap of attempting to finalise for safety. Past experience has taught me that remaining open and adaptable as much as possible right up to the date allows the work to grow and evolve in response to the show, tending to lead to much more unexpected, exciting outcomes.

 

After the meeting it was right back to the studio to get down to the planning and experimenting. Of course, although I want to keep things from finalising, I have to make some commitments to the routes I am going to pursue. I know that I will be constructing an installation drawing and roughly, what it will be but how is still a little unclear.  I also have committed myself to a performance. Outside these two main decisions things are still fairly fluid at the moment.  

 

On Friday I started some of the actual physical building of my drawing. This will be the most complicated thing to construct because it is going to be a 2d/3d line piece. These involve much measuring, calculating and accuracy. Definitely not something to be left until last minute, so I feel the earlier I get on the case with this the more relaxed I’m going to be about experimenting with the show as a whole. The fact that I have very little permanent physical work and that pretty much everything is made for a certain event/exhibition and then is gone, makes time and money a major anxiety factor when embarking on a new project. I find comfort in extreme organisation. Organisation and flexibility will hopefully be my strategy for surviving this show and making it successful.   

# 10 [23 March 2009]

Slowly getting back to normal routine this week thankfully. 

Last Friday I went along to the launch of Escalator held at the Wysing Arts Centre. Provided with name badge on arrival the day began with a ‘mingle’ and then we were seated in lecture style. (I got quite excited about being in this formal position of receiving information that I haven’t been in for such a while). I felt very student-like.

 

The overall focus of the presentation was to debate what do artists do? And what do artists want?- in order to explore how best to run the escalator project. With a room full of mainly artists and some curators from across the region, there were plenty of different opinions flying around. By the time we had been stimulated and loosened up by a controversial project by the artist Phyllida Barlow and involved in an interactive performance by artists Charlotte Thrane and Maria Zahle, we were left with lots of ideas to discuss over our lunch. Practically we seemed to all need the obvious things but more broadly speaking the issues where much more of a debate. I felt that as the day went on it became really apparent to me that the whole experience of ‘being there’ debating and discussing in this manner is exactly what most of us want. We all want time and space, money to produce, support and advice but this discussion process and link to peers, feels so important. Phyllida threw in a red rag and it was fresh and unusual and got our cogs turning. It is very important for an artist to feel they have a presence within these wider debates and to see their own concerns in relation to others. I feel it allowed me to gain a bit of perspective on my own situation and really consider these questions.

 

One thing that came up that I did find intriguing was this focus on location. All being from the East, some artists felt their location to be a significant factor in their identity as an artist. Suddenly I was being called a regional artist but I don’t know what this means to me. I don’t think I’ve given it much thought before. London reared itself up in conversations like a big monster; a vacuum that drew everything into it and threatened the identity of ‘regional’ artists, even it was suggested looked down on us. Really? Must we get defensive about our location? Do we have to defend ourselves and our identities against the hip and trendy of London? I have never felt living in the East defines me as an artist. It has been helpful living so close to London but I don’t feel that I must go there to be taken seriously or alternatively that I should reject it, just being an artist is enough definition for me. It did get me thinking about these issues of place though.   

# 9 [16 March 2009]

I’ve fallen on to page four of the blog pages… that doesn’t give a sense of keeping it going that I’d like to have at the moment. The reason I haven’t written is because I knew I would have hardly anything to say since the central thing going on for me over the last two months, I haven’t allowed myself to tell anyone about. (In the hope of reducing any pressure or expectation of me, to which I have discovered didn’t make a snitch of a difference to the experience as the worst culprit in my life of placing pressure on me is… surprise, surprise…ME!

 

Since Christmas I made the decision that I would apply to do an MA. To cut a very long drawn out episode short… I applied to Wimbledon to do their Fine Art Drawing MA, went for an interview and after two weeks of convincing myself that the interview went terribly, got accepted. Yay!

 

That little ‘yay’ really does mean a lot. I have been thinking about doing an MA for a long time and have felt so ready to do it and have wanted to do it at Wimbledon with a passionate feeling that it is the right course and place for me. The agony of thinking I had screwed up a little interview and blown my opportunity was quite a kick and a wobble. After almost literally biting the post woman’s hand off everyday for the last two weeks it came last Friday, by which time my nerves were wrecked and I was laid up in bed with the worst stomach bug I’ve had since I was a kid and could barely be bothered to crawl down the stairs half an hour after I originally heard the letterbox flutter so innocently. So there it was in writing ‘unconditional offer’ wonderrrrfulllll!

 

So now I’m almost upright again and starting to whistle a happy tune as I start to contemplate new and exciting challenges and influences that will be coming my way.

The only thing I now need to wait for is to find out whether I can get funding for it. I should find this out by May. I got my application in early so that I could be considered for the Arts and Humanities Research Council funding and since Wimbledon have been awarded the block funding from them, I now have to wait on Wimbledon’s decision on who they will be awarding their Studentships to. If I don’t get this funding….. um…. I’m not sure really…. grow money in the back garden?? Then will come the dilemma.

View comment icon View 2 comments »

Comments on this post

Thanks! I am really excited and feel very ready. Since doing my BA it has really taken me all this time to feel like I want to go back in to the uni environment and that I could fully benefit from doing an MA. Before now I've always thought I'd only be doing it because it's there to do. It's great to hear you've done the same course and that it really had an affect on your practice. I think a kick up the arse is just what I need! Cheers x

posted on 2009-05-01 by Christina Bryant

Congrats on the offer at Wimbledon. I had similar feelings about the course/place and did the MA Drawing in 05/06. It was great - not without the usual institutional failings, which are expected - and Christine was a fantastic tutor. It was also a massive kick up the arse and did wonders for my thinking/working/practice generally. Enjoy!!

posted on 2009-04-29 by Emily Speed

Page 3 of 4 :

This project blog »

Christina Bryant

I currently have a Fellowship with the Digswell Arts Trust. I have been there for three years, joining a year after gaining my BA in Fine Art. I now only have a year and a half left with the Trust and have started to hear the clock ticking. This is the year to look beyond the safety of the Trust and look to my next steps.

www.christinabryant.co.uk/wordpress