Visual art exhibitions and events with a platform for critical writing
FeedbackInappropriate material?
Ideas? Technical issues?
» Feedback to a-n
By: Emily Speed
Rather than talk about my work on here (I have tried it and it seems to make me quite despondent) I have decided it will be far more helpful for me to explore some of the issues facing artists trying to make a living out of this business...
Emily Speed is an artist based in Liverpool.
# 80 [28 July 2009]
Events here at the Salzamt in Linz have got me thinking about the way artists get treated sometimes. The atmosphere between the three international artists here (including me) is glum to say the least. Instead of getting on with work, we are all pretty worried about money as we have still not been paid. I have just been paid a bit from Tate Liverpool and have borrowed off three people to keep me going. I will have been here three weeks on Thursday and have also paid for my travel to get here. Needless to say, I don't have any savings to rely on, haven't worked this month elsewhere and so have no income until September 1st (Yorkshire Sculpture Park). I just feel glad that there are people I can ask for help and that I have pounds not Krooni.
I am starting to feel a bit foolish as there is absolutely nothing I can do about it. I came here on the strength of some emails (the first from Liverpool Biennial - so I know the money will come). There is no contract, no guarantees and even the amount we are getting seems to have changed (materials money has disappeared from the equasion). Apart from not really getting the benefits of being in a new exciting land, there is also the worry that I have to exhibit some new work in three weeks. I had hoped this residency would be a good chance to play about with some materials (wood, concrete and resin were in my head) or make something really ambitious in this wonderful space I have, but currently I am saving my money for food. Although I am sure the money will come before then, time to play about and make is also important, and it feels like it is slipping away. I shall have to be content for now with my paper and cardboard... and I am still being ambitious, but not in the ways I hoped! I feel like this problem may be fixed for the next batch of residents as we are almost like guinea pigs, but that doesn't help today.
So, how often do artists have to put themselves in this position? I know I have, many times. I have also signed contracts, which included payment dates, amounts and what was expected of me. I got paid on time and did what I said (sometimes more) and it was easy and good. Perhaps contracts don't always work out either? It just seems artists are not very likely to have savings, a steady income or other back-ups (i.e. living in your overdraft already), so they will be ill-equipped to deal with delays and non-payments. Pah. I suppose another lesson learned; not to rely on immediate payment or to trust vague figures from an email. At least we have beds!
Login to post a comment »
# 79 [28 July 2009]
So, the Linz blog has had to go for now. I stopped blogging about my work for lots of reasons last year, and thought it might be different during a residency. But it's not. I think I tend to get overly introspective and it's just not that great for the work-making.
It was getting complicated too as various people here at the Salzamt in Linz were reading it, and when I found that out I felt pretty uncomfortable about how much of myself was laid bare for them all to see!
In the meantime, there are some observations I have been making about artists working here and some interviews to write up. I am also busy writing an article for the Linz Neuner Magazine. Just need to wait for my sunkissed glow to die down (ahem) before Jens can take my portrait to go with it.
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Thanks Carol -much appreciated! No doubt Linz will creep in to this blog... but yes, it had to go!.
posted on 2009-07-29 by Emily Speed
Shame about the Linz blog, I had been enjoying following events over there. Can understand how it may be a bit awkward though. Hope you manage to get the money through to be able to enjoy the residency. Good Luck with it all.
posted on 2009-07-29 by Carol Ramsay
[enlarge]
'Shed. '.
# 78 [21 July 2009]
As I mentioned earlier, I thought the Capital of Culture year in Liverpool pretty much ignored and perhaps even took money out of (?) the grassroots art culture (some of the best, fiestyest and most innovative in the country may I say!). That fact seems to pale into insignificance when the olympics loom into view.
criticalnetwork put it very well on their latest bulletin:
"criticalnetwork says NO! to the Cultural Olympiad
We have been receiving a large number of submissions regarding events that form part of the Cultural Olympiad. Please note that we will not list any events that form part of this pointless, hegemonic and excessively drawn-out programme.
As a collective of artists practising throughout the UK we directly oppose the Cultural Olympiad at every level on the basis that it aims to co-opt the work of artists to white wash the crimes of the 2012 Olympics and manufacture an appearance of acceptability at the expensive of (primarily grassroots) arts activity throughout the UK.
A large proportion (more than £200m) of the ludicrous £10bn cost of the 2012 Olympics is being redistributed from the arts sector nationally and is creating a culture in which artists and art organisations are compromising their integrity, desperately trying to incorporate irrelevant Olympic themes in to their work in the hope of receiving financial support. The Cultural Olympiad is the folly of cultural middle-managers and policy makers, it is art as tourism, it is the Capital City over the rest of the country, it is not going to feature on criticalnetwork."
Couldn't have said it better.. I hope the park will at least continue to be used, how depressing to go somewhere like Barcelona and see a garveyard of a park that was once an over-budget, must have thing just for the Olympics. I am not a fan, yet here I am trying to get a flight from BA in their competition. This is all tied in with the Olympics and they say on the website 'This scheme will look for individuals who demonstrate the values associated with Olympic and Paralympic Games and who strive to be the best' hmm, I strive to be MY best, which is not the same thing.. but I really want the flight. Victoria, a book artist in Argentina, and I have been emailing for ages and have also been brewing great plans! Am I a hypocrite? Is British Airways giving away free flights (based on some bizarre voting scheme, but they go ahead and pick the shortlist regardless) system the same as supporting the Olympics? I hope not!
Don't even get me started on the allotments.
To subscribe to criticalnetwork bulletins go here:
http://www.criticalnetwork.co.uk/home.php
Do any artists really want the Olymipics? I'm curious..
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Actually, over the past year or so, every ACE Grants for the Arts application form has had a box which you are supposed to tick "if you wish your project to be considered for the Cultural Olympiad". I did look into this when I was fundraising for my last job, and I did not tick the box as the projects I wanted to undertake did not mesh with the "brand identity" of the Cultural Olympiad, and I wasn't willing to alter them in order to become a part of this. I'm not entirely sure that there's any extra funding in it (though I might be wrong) - just a chance for extra visibility. There might be some decent projects happening as a result of this: people who were applying for grants anyway, and whose project just happened to fit the bill. As an artist, no, I wouldn't do a project for the Olympics, even if it did mean getting paid. I'd sooner work in a shop than sell my work out; additionally, I find it very difficult to produce work 'to order', tailor-made to a corporate brief. I might be stupid and mulish and bull-headed, but that's my personal feeling about it (subject to change, of course!). I know exactly what you mean re. artists being brought in to add a little bit of frosting to various sociopolitical agendas / whatever. I'd like to hear less about "Culture" (capital 'c'!) and more about art. Good art benefits society and effects social change without all of this ephemeral, spurious, condescending nonsense. I think I'm veering away from the subject now: time for bed!
posted on 2009-07-24 by Jo Moore
Hmm, oneupmanship, a good description for it I think Jo. I think that's what really bothers me..seems like each city who has it (and other things like CofC) just gets hell-bent on being the best shiniest most fabulous one yet, even if it means spending above and beyond your means: to hell with society's day-to-day problems, we need tourists thinking we're awesome. Ambition is admirable, but can quickly turn into folly. I love the sport bits (well just gymnastics if I'm honest) but for me that has little to do with the argument and that is the problem I suppose - it should be about that! I am not opposing the Olympics per se, but objecting to the money that it has taken out of the arts. criticalnetwork also use the phrase 'co-opt the work of artists to white wash the crimes of the 2012 Olympics and manufacture an appearance of acceptability' which puts succinctly (for me at least) the issues that arise when artists are brought in to complement and add sprinkles to an agenda (sorry, theme). I haven't heard much about art projects under the Olympic banner yet though, so I am trying to keep an open mind, although I realise it may not sound that way! Would you do a project for the Olympics if you were given some money?
posted on 2009-07-24 by Emily Speed
(Rather unbelievably) I used to sprint when I was younger, competitively. And I loved it; for me it was like dancing (which I also loved): a very physical sort of freedom. And it is amazing and inspiring to watch Olympic athletes just as it is amazing and inspiring to watch dancers (I'm particularly thinking of ballet): there's a purity of form and of movement that's beautiful. The Olympic ideal links in to other Ancient Greek thoughts about discipline, form and purity which can be found in their sculpture, architecture, philosophical writings, etc. I don't think we can afford to be snobby about it (not saying that you are, Emily; just speaking generally). But I wholeheartedly disagree with the corporatisation of it, and the way in which we're encouraged to think in terms of a jingoistic sort of national pride; a oneupmanship - just as I disagree with the corporatisation of the arts. It's all part of the same problem. Speaking as an artist, I will say that yes, I do want the Olympics - but no, I do not want this kind of Olympics. Just as yes, I loved the idea of Liverpool being CoC, but no, I did not love the way in which it was approached. I think that the Olympics Committee / whatever they're called are complete and utter criminals, and I totally endorse criticalnetwork's standpoint on the patronising Cultural Olympiad.
posted on 2009-07-24 by Jo Moore
Yep, the Olympics is not all bad in principle: the sport and involvement bit, definitely important! The massively over-budget event to achieve this - is it really necessary? Does it have to cost so much? It just seems to me that with a lot of these huge events, it is mainly marketing and a bit of a fa?e. How many people feel really connected with it, especially local people? It seems the problem with it a lack of foresight too.. things are built/bulldozed etc and it doesn't seem like this is a decision based on the next 100 years, but just enough until 2012. Yes, the east end needs some investment, but shouldn't that be about the people who live there and what they will use?
posted on 2009-07-24 by Emily Speed
I think the Olympics are really important. Sport is an art and a skill. If it encourages all the over weight young people to get outside for some freshair then it will be a great success. The bigger issue is not the Olympics itself and i feel sad when i here stories of concrete being put over beautiful wetlands so that people can park their cars!!
posted on 2009-07-24 by Karen Mcleod
# 77 [21 July 2009]
If anyone has a few spare minutes perhaps you could go here:
http://www.greatbritons.ba.com/users/16501
You have to sign up I'm afraid and can either leave a (nice!) comment on my profile or give it 5 stars by clicking on the last star on the right... this should help get the project shortlisted.. maybe?
When you write yor profile they ask you to include 'emotive stories' to get the sympathy/support of the British public.. I, however, have no sob story - I just want to get an interesting exchange project between book artists in Liverpool and Buenos Aires off the ground!
Thanks, very grateful to anyone who can take a few minutes out to help.. only five days left to vote!
Login to post a comment »
# 76 [19 July 2009]
"His report will warn of a growing culture of unpaid, unadvertised internships now increasingly required to get into competitive fields which is excluding even relatively well-off children if their parents lack the social connections to secure them."
Alan Milburn's report on private/state education cited by Gaby Hinsliff in an article from the Guardian today:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/jul/19/pr...
Login to post a comment »
# 75 [17 July 2009]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2009/jul/15/yba-...
The Guardian interviews four graduates fresh out of Goldsmiths - these lot don't seem to be letting the recession dictate things for them..
Login to post a comment »
# 74 [14 July 2009]
"Arts Council England today announced final details of an organisation-wide restructure that will transform the way it serves the arts and audiences. The restructure will save £6.5 million a year in administration costs and these savings will be invested in the arts."
http://press.artscouncil.org.uk/Content/Detail.asp...
Login to post a comment »
[enlarge]
Katharina Gruzei, 'Re-presenting'.
# 73 [12 July 2009]
One of the local artists working here at the Salzamt (for a one-year period), Katharina Gruzei, is leaving to go to Salzburg for a months teaching today, so I asked her if I could email the questions I wanted to ask in my interview, so she could respond by email, or be prepared for a quick interview next time she is around. We ended up talking about making a living anyway and talking about the precarity and sheer edges in an artist’s existence.
I asked whether she makes a living from her work and she replied that currently she does, but in the autumn, her stipend runs out and the worry begins again. It seems to me she is very talented and proactive and will have no trouble finding future support, but I thought that I am in exactly the same position. This year and until July 2010, I am supported: I have enough income from bursaries and residency fees to live without too much worry. I know, however that there is nothing after July, and so I will be busy doing applications in the autumn and spring to try and fill this void, or at least provide a small stepping stone to the next respite.
We also talked about the fact that we never found ourselves in the most desirable position: having made some work and then being given money/time to make new work. The bursaries we both have are to make new work within a time-frame, or more honestly, to try and make new work alongside other activities such as teaching and writing reports that are attached to this funding. This makes the supported time feel like there is little room for mistakes: the funding brings pressure and a spotlight that did not exist before. This seems ironic when I consider that the funding is intended for a period of making new work, time to play and experiment, fail, figure it out and start again. Perhaps this real experimentation is never possible when you are being given public or charitable funds? This money comes with responsibility to produce things and show money well spent. Perhaps also, it is just the nature of making art that we (artists) are too hard on ourselves, feeling pressure acutely and being unable to escape the looming uncertainty that comes after any opportunity?
http://katharinagruzei.blogspot.com/
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
That's the other thing too... the applications! One foot in the present and the other testing the sludgy ground in the future whilst also looking down and concentrating on what you're trying to achieve..
posted on 2009-07-13 by Emily Speed
Thanks for your comments Rob, interesting to hear another viewpoint. I am curious as to whether your work is usually on quite a big scale/public art? I hardly ever seem to see commissioning processes paid for unless the budget is over £15,000 at least! I know it's best practice, but it doesn't seem to be common practice? I suppose my funding at the moment is a little different as it is for R and D, although in that post I was really referring to my main source of funding, which doesn't start until September: it seems to have more and more work attached to it every time I make contact and I'm not sure when this making new work business will ever get a chance...
posted on 2009-07-13 by Emily Speed
Hi Emily, It is an interesting point that one about public money. My practice is allways funded by public money and there is conciderable preasure not to waste it, or use it badly as this reflects poorly on me and the commissioner. I would hope to foster confidence in the art commissioning process so that further schemes are funded for another artist at a later date. Experimenting with ideas and materials is a brave decision with public money, and would need to fill the commissioner with confidence to attempt it. That why artists make models and machettes to test these ideas. These are paid for in the ideas development phase of the commission. The public generally hate to have what they believe is in effect their taxes spent on something which is not reachable to them, or poorly made with the wrong materials and turns out to be a mistake. But fortune favours the brave and great things can be done with public money, good luck with your applications.
posted on 2009-07-12 by Rob Turner
Hi Emily. Thankyou for your comments, most appreciated that you have taken time out to look at my blog when you clearly are very busy. Check out the rest of it if you get chance. The unfinished thing is a new approach to get this vastness and infinity in the ordinary. Your world seems a mile away from my own the only public funding I have had was from Longhouse (view there web or the link on my website) and I found the action research very free to experiment. Good luck with the rest of your visit.
posted on 2009-07-12 by Anthony Boswell
I have just realised this comes across as a bit gloomy! I am not wanting to appear ungrateful or to whine about the fact that I have some funding (it's very much appreciated) - just to admit the realities of it, which are not always as idealistic as they may seem!
posted on 2009-07-12 by Emily Speed
# 72 [11 July 2009]
This article, from the latest issue of Variant, is really interesting..
Artist as Executive, Executive as Artist
Kirsten Forkert
http://www.variant.org.uk/35texts/CultLeader.html
It references this article from the Guardian on 19/01/08, which I reckon is also worth a read:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jan/1...
‘No pay, no gain: The reliance on unpaid interns in Britain’s industries puts poorer graduates at a disadvantage and makes a mockery of our so-called meritocratic society’,
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Gosh, never mind the article, the comments and links to that sum it all up!! Thanks for finding that and sharing, Emily!!!
posted on 2009-07-13 by Helen Dearnley
# 71 [11 July 2009]
I have just added a new blog post on Intute: Toolkits and free advice for the visual arts. Have a look!
The post has links to various organisations and online resources with free advice and opportunity listings. Happy browsing.
Login to post a comment »