Visual art exhibitions and events with a platform for critical writing
FeedbackInappropriate material?
Ideas? Technical issues?
» Feedback to a-n
By: Emily Speed
Rather than talk about my work on here (I have tried it and it seems to make me quite despondent) I have decided it will be far more helpful for me to explore some of the issues facing artists trying to make a living out of this business...
Emily Speed is an artist based in Liverpool.
# 21 [27 February 2009]
The Government have said that Arts Council need to cut admin costs by 15% by next year:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2009/feb/26/arts...
Might this be the start of a mini-revolution where artists begin to adapt, cut out the middle men and sort out their own affairs a la direct holidays and direct line car insurance? Well, perhaps not, but we could shed some brokers could we not?
I have an image in my head of a cake in need of flour and plenty is being poured in to the mix, but as it goes through numerous sieves it is gradually siphoned off and clogged up until the cake is hardly left with enough to rise.
I'm not saying the flour doesn't need sieving - it does, but you can go overboard.
Login to post a comment »
# 22 [27 February 2009]
I just read in a-n with great sadness that the Gomperts Trust will not have enough income to award grants this year.
I have received two grants from the trust and have found it such a supportive organisation. This is probably due in part, to the very personal and genuine reasons for the family setting up the trust - in memory of their duaghter and sister. It is also because of Natasha Gomperts, an artist herself, who takes a personal interest in the artists' work and allows a relatonship to develop. The last grant I received was also thanks to Greg Daville, an artist who sadly passed away last year. A previous recipient himself, he interviewed me with Natasha and I am grateful that for a short time before his death we were able to have conversations, swap reading lists and discover common ground via email.
The Juliet Gomperts Trust for me, is a model of how funding would be given in an ideal world: without preconceptions about what will be funded, what outcomes should occur and with a real down-to-earth bent that is not impressed by hollow words. Their recent residency at the Torriano meeting house seemed like a very forward thinking turn for the Trust, who also fund artists undertaking a residency in Italy. I sincerely hope they are able to improve their income in the future and carry on the good work.
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Schools mean well when they work with artists but what really, really confuses me is why oh why are we treated so much worse than a plumber or a supply teacher when it comes to pay? The latest scam is that when we make one of our laborious applications that take at least a day and then we are expected to make an hour long presentation to try and get the job. We are now asked not even to apply if we can't leave the day of the interview free for interview. Now can you imagine a supply teacher not being asked to give details unless she can leave any possible hypothetical day that she may be required or not required free or a Plummer who was meant to be twiddling his thumbs just in case you got a leak. The reason that I use a supply teacher as an example is that we get paid the same rates as them. Although we are meant to have personal liability insurance, supply equipment etc. The arts council has a code of practice that says that if you have over 10 years experience you are supposed to be paid a higher rate has anyone had experience of this? I know that requesting this would infringe on my chances of getting work. I think much of the problem with organisation such as Creative Partnerships who uses artists to work in schools is that all the consideration is going to the schools and the kids and not the artists. I wish they were more open to real feed back from us. The amounts we are paid look much higher than they are because in effect we are required to make ourselves available over the whole period of a project and only paid for the day we work on it and we have so many other expenses We should be paid more in line with actors because of this. We DESPERATELY NEED A UNION!
posted on 2009-03-12 by founder Britishwomenartists
quick blurb-you any chance Emily graduated from Sir John Deane's Northwich? sharonspaintings@gmail.com If so please drop us a line to say hello-about your current art projects-i'm based in Glasgow got first major solo show coming up in Denmark-will send info. Best, Sharon Thomas
posted on 2009-03-01 by Sharon Thomas
# 23 [3 March 2009]
Interesting comments here about Mr Bourriard, his altermodern and the state of the art market of late. Does anyone think that Damien Hirst style production/ value markets will really collapse?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/01/tate-britain-bourriaud-art-market
Login to post a comment »
# 24 [10 March 2009]
I have just been having a conversation over email with another artist about paying to enter things.
I my head I have a very clear rule about this: I don't do it. On reflection I thought that there are some things I would pay to enter, these being competitions on the level of BSR and the Jerwood prizes.
We began by discussing Celeste, a fairly new prize that now has an online focus. It has various categories and costs 50 Euros to enter. Finalists are decided by selection commitee and finalists themselves decide how the prize money is awarded. The website does, usefully, have a pretty little pie chart showing how entry fees are spent:
http://www.celesteprize.com/prize/
25% - prizes, 10% website, 23% employment and 13% selectors fees and so on. So, to be simplistic about it - that means that as prizes total Eur40,000, therefore wages add up to Eur36,800 and the selectors will earn Eur20,800 between them with the website costing Eur16,000. That's a hell of a website!!
Rather than a competition for cutting edge contemporary art, this seems more like a game show format to me, much like Saatchi's upcoming TV show, which is a game show - right? In this model, artists, especially those who are inexperienced and might not know any better, are being used as a source of funding. Want to put on a show/festival/residency? I know; just get £35 off each person entering and it will pay for itself, plus we can employ ourselves for the duration, genius!
People - this is your money!! If you're going to spend it anyway, wouldn't it be better spent elsewhere, perhaps on some food, or even getting people together and sorting our your own project? I'm not saying the prize has no value; for the winners it has incredible value, and also for the finalists I expect. The website may generate opportunities for people adding their work to the entries too. But for the majority, those who the competition depends on for funding, it won't do much at all. Spend the entry fee on a subscription to a-n and axis instead, where you will be aligned with a much more desirable (and credible) crowd.
I also get fed-up trawling through res-artis, which a couple of years ago I used all the time. Now, although it is still an amazing resource for finding residencies, it also lists numerous places that seem like little more than posh bed and breakfasts around Europe, with studios attached. Not so much an application form as a booking form here. Much more time has to be spent weeding out opportunities that represent work rather than a nice hoiday.
We all know there is not enough funding out there and that other ways are needed to make art more self-sufficient, but to my mind, entry fees and dumbing down on quality to appeal to and use the masses are not it.
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
I agree as well. It smells of a scam, like those emails you get that tell you "Congratulations! You've won the Irish Lottery! Now give us your bank details so we can rob you blind" - it's also elitist pap that prevents those with any real talent from entering. I do not hear of anyone WINNING said prizes..... Although, it does seem like a good way of making money - I'm setting one up myself - everyone get your wallets ready....... ;-) How much does it cost to enter the Turner Prize???? How DO you enter The Turner Prize????
posted on 2009-03-13 by Helen Dearnley
I totally agree and have written about it on my own blog in the past. I understand why artists put in for these kind of shows and residencies but I don't think it's a good strategy unless a show has the status of something like the Jerwood. Unfortunately, I've been noticing more and more of these kind of 'opportunities' appearing in a-n. It really irritates me that the people in the art world least likely to get paid are constantly expected to fund other people.
posted on 2009-03-12 by Kirsty Hall
What a surprising post this was. Firstly, I am just writing my report to the Juliet Gomperts trust to say what an encouraging support their award has been to me. What a real shame, they supported me financially right where I needed it without lots of hoops to jump through and therefore made a huge benefit to my ongoing practice. Secondly, Greg Daville has died - oh how sad. I knew him briefly in Brighton and very much admired his work, at the time I had hoped we might exhibit together. What a great loss. Thirdly and less personally, I too tend to refuse to pay for applying (although succumbed to the Artsway one recently, wont be doing so again), but one I did pay for and prefer was the Bristol Contemporary Open, set up by and for artists which charged a much higher fee but only to be paid by those accepted by a solidly respected jury - they only accepted twenty, we all got a much larger space and the money just covered costs, publicity etc. much fairer if you are going to pay than 800 applications at '25 each with 100 accepted showing one small piece.
posted on 2009-03-12 by Susan Francis
[enlarge]
'Lost at Sea', artists' book, 2009.
[enlarge]
Emily Speed, 'Lost at Sea', artists' book, 2009
# 25 [13 March 2009]
I am mainly surrounded by piles of paper as I put together book after book after book in preparation for BABE (Bristol Artists' Book Event) on the first weekend in April.
After the last 'paying to enter' things entry, I had to think about this as a table at an artists' book fair costs money. BABE is £80 for the weekend and then of course, you need to add in petrol and sleeping. My answer to these costs is to take my husband with me and try and make it into a nice weekend away. The really hard bit is not buying too much of other people's work!
I have been really struggling to make the books I want to as I just can't pay for materials/production. Instead of beautifully made, gleaming, letterpressed editions, I end up with pamphlet stitched books done on my printer and with a little screenprinting. I long to be back at Women's Studio Workshop in NY, where I did a book residency last year. Never before have I appreciated time and facilities to make work so very much. I was like a machine! They are another organisation that have had funding cuts this year. I wish I could do something to help. If I ever won pots of money, that would be one of the first donations!
I organised Liverpool Artists' Book Fair last year and really struggled with table charges as I know how difficult it is to do these events. As it was tables were charged at £25/weeekend and £15 for one day. This just paid for advertising and paying cafe workers. For hours of work over four months, I didn't pay myself a bean. But, I loved doing it, it was the first one and Bristol and others offer so much more in terms of audience and establishment. This year, to avoid killing myself with all that unpaid work again, the book fair has had to go. It has a good home and will be at A Foundation this year, but it was so very difficult to give all my work away in exchange for goodwill.
I suppose BABE has to be thought of as a trade fair and therefore, an investment. It is a financial risk, but I have my fingers crossed that I can at least break even........
http://artistsbookfairliverpool.blogspot.com/
http://www.arnolfini.org.uk/whatson/exhibitions/de...
http://wsworkshop.org/
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Two words: Dragon's Den ;-)
posted on 2009-03-13 by Helen Dearnley
# 26 [16 March 2009]
Top of my list to do today is send feedback for the CCS consultation:
http://www.ccskills.org.uk/visualarts
The process is an open one so please go to the website, read throught the document and send your thoughts on it! It could be a really influential document so it's important to have your say...
It's kind of a week from hell this week, teaching/talking in Lancaster tomorrow, big big interview on Wednesday, long drive to Bishop Auckland to talk about work for Art Land on Thursday and my beloved Grandad's funeral on Friday, followed by a presentation at A foundation on Friday evening and a workshop with teenagers for Respect week in Everton on Saturday. Phew.
It's good as well as terrifying and stressful. I need all of this stuff to keep my momentum going through the funeral and all the way to the workshop. I can, after all, collapse (a little bit) on Sunday. My life does seem to go the way of the bus analogy and it can make me a very determined, but fractious and impatient person to live with. Either that or I am plagued with guilt and self-doubt! Oh joy.
It has make me think though, when do I ever actually have a whole day off? Not very often at all. The last time was probably my honeymoon, so I hope I can remember to make more time for that this year! Leaving internet and phone behind may be the first step..
Login to post a comment »
[enlarge]
'Bishop Auckland'.
# 27 [21 March 2009]
I am exhausted. Having spent the week heading up and down the country and stressing (hadn't realised just how much until I stopped!) I am ready for bed at 19.40 on a Saturday night.
Lancaster on Tuesday was great, a very warm welcome from Suzy at Storey Gallery. Gave tutorials at the uni, had a very nice dinner and then gave a talk about me/Wolstenholme Projects/the state of money and arts at the Duke's Theatre there. I hope I didn't rant too much, but a lot of issues from the blog came up, especially as it was a chance for me to see what artists elsewhere thought. The talk resulted in a fair bit of discussion, which is good, I think. I was asked a lot of questions I couldn't really answer, but people seemed to agree about rates of pay and not working for free!!
Wednesday was an interview for a bursary at Yorkshire Sculpture Park - which I got!! Success and 100 days of gainful employment over 09/10. I am having to think of it as a kind of apprenticeship really as it pays, but only £100 per day and I will also have to pay for my own travel/accomodation out of the bursary. It will still be a fantastic thing to do, but not as glossy as it seems. I am very excited though and looking forward to the first meeting in June.
Thursday I went up to Bishop Auckland to meet James Lowther, one of the organisers of Art Land, a site-specific art festival taking place in April. A lovely chap and an amazing sunny day looking round and gathering information and scraps of inspiration for the bookwork I have been commissioned to make. He also offered to pay my expenses to come up for the opening to do a reading from the work (when I have made it!!). I'm very glad as the other work going into the festival looks really interesting and it would be a shame to not see it!
http://artlandne.com/programme/
Friday was a funeral and Saturday was being shattered.
Now I have to try hard not to spend my future money before it has been earned, but I would so like some resin... ahem.
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
final section of previous comment: I'm not saying artists shouldn't have to earn money. I personally enjoy the teaching and freelance work that I do but I am aware of the restrictions that arise when one's art practice gets sidelined as a result. Thanks for the blog, it's good to see others discussing these pressing issues.
posted on 2009-03-24 by Susan Diab
I have been wanting to read your blog for a while, Emily, and have finally got round to it. I've just read through the whole blog fairly quickly and been very interested to hear your discussions and people's responses to them. As an artist myself and one who is also involved in teaching and in delivering various 'professional' development services to other artists I concern myself a great deal with the question of how to earn a living as an artist. This has moved across into my work on occasion and indeed I have just made a new work which is a sign that says 'Work for a Living' where the 'f' flashes on and off so that it also reads 'Work or a Living' at times. This accompanies work I made as a commission which I have made under the name of 'Work for a Living'. I have decided to use that name for work that I make when I am paid to make it. This is a bit of an experiment for me but it is a way I have found of raising the question of what changes when money is involved in the process of making work. Of course, money is always involved somewhere but there is a difference to being entirely my own boss and coming up with whatever ideas I want to and doing as I please and making work to order. Commissions can be very stimulating opportunities to engage with projects you wouldn't otherwise think of doing on your own but there can also be drawbacks. 'Work for a Living' as a name but also as a work, follows on from a piece I made a few years ago called 'Practice Makes Perfect', which was a short video of me practising carving these words into a block of wood. The idea is to ask what practice is if we don't actually have time to practise (i.e. to do something consistently and spend time on it in order to get good at it) because we are also trying to earn a living. I'm not saying artists shouldn't have to earn money. I personally enjoy the teaching and freelance work that I do but I am aware of the restrictions that arise when one's art practice gets sidelined a
posted on 2009-03-24 by Susan Diab
# 28 [7 April 2009]
Well, it's been three weeks since my last post. That pretty much sums up my life: massive spurts of activity only to be distracted by something else I want to try and swapping for a while. Again, the picture of the octopus artist crops up again as I imagine lots of us are trying to negotiate many tangled paths..
Last weekend was BABE (Bristol Artists' Book Event) at the Arnolfini. The first time I have had a table at a book fair, and I was really quite concerned about the outlay - not just making the books, but the table cost, journey, accomodation. It adds up! I did sell books though, most of them actually, and broke even. But I can't even think about the fact that even though I covered costs, at the end of the day it was like giving all of those books away for nothing! The next book fair I will be doing is Liverpool, so none of those costs involved.. I did, however, sell a book to the Tate collection, so that compensates a little for a lack of money. I think BABE also raised my profile somewhat as my website got so many hits over the weekend it nearly fell over!
http://emilyspeed.co.uk/
On Thursday I am going up to Bishop Auckland for the opening of Art Land,
http://artlandne.com/programme/
and although I am dreading the drive, I am really looking forward to the whole thing. It is always great to get a chance to make work somewhere else and most importantly, escape the things that distract me (washing, cooking, making a mess of the flat and depairing at it). When I go elsewhere I am free of these things and that has always meant very productive times for me.
Login to post a comment »
# 29 [13 April 2009]
Good old arts jobs.
I saw this and laughed out loud. Someone else (surely please) understands the sad state of things! Thanks to Rose Smith for reminding me to post this. All over-qualified CVs to Keith as quick as you can:
Job: Cleaner, nottsnewartspace
East Midlands Unpaid (Voluntary) Full time
Artform: dance, interdisciplinary arts, theatre, visual arts
Contact keith Hetherington pnewartspace@hotmail.com
Description:
Gallery Assistant required for cleaning duties at the 'New Art Space' in notts, sneinton. Duties require unblocking gully and vacuum drain daily. Dusting and sweeping exhibition space after pre construction. Would suit recent graduate wishing to gain experience within facilities management.
Please send c.v to Keith Hetherington at ewartspace@hotmail.com
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
I'm glad you laughed and didn't go "AAAAAARRRRRGH!" like I do! Thanks for reminding me that job ads such as this should be viewed with Monty Python / John Cleese tinted specs - you just couldn't make it up could you?! Is anyone going to email and point out the error of his ways?? It might suit Catherine Bertola, but I think she'd prefer to be paid a proper salary ;-)
posted on 2009-04-29 by Helen Dearnley
# 30 [27 April 2009]
This month has been one for talking it seems. I have been asked to do talks on several of the things I am involved with; me (!), Wolstenholme Projects and the book fair mostly.
On Saturday night I was at IMT gallery in London (a beautiful space) for a panel discussion about artists' books and their distribution. It was very interesting, but the slant on the questioning from the chair was so focused on distribution I was left (about 5 minutes in) wondering what I could contribute. As the other panelists were a publisher and a book-shop owner (and book artist) I felt quite low-fi in comparison. The huge disparity in our outlooks/ agendas meant that rather than having a broad ranging debate, it was difficult to discuss fludily as there was just no need for us to agree or disagree on many of the points.
This just demonstrates the massive range of work that is going on in the field. It may have also been because we were in London, in a gallery, where selling things matters. I cringed inside at one point where I had to pipe up and point out that discussion was getting very London-centric and esoteric. I felt alien to the discussion yet I think I am a good example of someone who makes artists' books, where it is not the whole of my practice, but just the best medium for some ideas and also something I make without considering its distribution and audience beforehand.
Books Fairs, which were hardly discussed in comparison to publishers, represent for me the first point of sale for most book artists. They have their own problems but do offer a fantastic opportunity to meet other artists, see work, touch work and maybe buy work too. I am quite unconcerned about getting my books into Waterstones, and as shops such as Tate and ICA also require distributors, I would be much more inclined to look elsewhere like the Book Art Book Shop or the Permanent Gallery to stock my work. Additionally, talking about Ed Rucha et al and their books is interesting and relevant in terms of the history of artists' books, but he and others who were published represent the very few. I suppose the problem for me ended up being that if there were any book artists' in the audience hoping for some insight into outlets for their work, they would have been disappointed.
Tonight is the AIR open dialogue event at Castlefield Gallery in Manchester. This is artists talking about their practice and how they approach it/manage life, the universe and everything. I am certainly looking forward to a more practical bent.
Login to post a comment »