Visual art exhibitions and events with a platform for critical writing
FeedbackInappropriate material?
Ideas? Technical issues?
» Feedback to a-n
By: Jane Boyer
This blog looks at the benefits and pitfalls of working in isolation. One significant aspect of this isolation is a rich and deepening understanding of art history. I'll explore that relationship to my work, my practice and my efforts to bridge the gap.
Born in the USA, currently living and working in France, Jane's artistic background has been a lifelong fascination with the visual world, as she has experienced it.
With formal education and life experience in many practical things, she still relates to a world filled with forms, colors, space, relationships and distortions.
She says, "nothing tells me I'm an artist more than knowing the space in my own head".
[enlarge]
Jane Boyer, 'Form that reveals its fold becomes force 1', mixed media on canvas, copyright 2011.
# 51 [15 July 2011]
I said recently in a newsletter that I no longer felt isolated, thanks to all the great people I've connected with and who have become friends and colleagues. I'll say once again, this connection was made possible by an and the Artists Talking platform. Every connection I've made has been as a result of my blog here. There is another person I want thank too and that is my husband, David. I would not be able to do any of the things I do in London without his support and his belief in my talent and ability. I'm also fortunate to have a very supportive family who encourage me at every turn. To all of you individually and collectively, my heartfelt thanks and gratitude.
Marion Michell, an artist who makes the most arresting crocheted garments and shoes from tissue paper; you may remember her from Extra-Ordinary at Core Gallery; she sent me this message recently, 'It's great to see how well you're doing and how things have changed for you since you started your blog and got involved with Core Gallery. There's hope for us all.' It was lovely to receive this note and it reminded me again that the issue of isolation is a big one and one many artist face, and perhaps don't quite know how to change.
If I could answer the question of isolation for artists, it would be simple - start a blog, commit to it and actively talk to other people on their blogs. It is delightful to receive a comment on a blog and even more invigorating when a conversation starts.
My next piece of advice is get involved with an artist collective and become active and involved in it. This one career move could be the most important one an artist can make because the professional practice and activities of an artist-led space/collective are the stepping stones to broader professional activity. It is also a place where you can explore your interests and develop other professional aspects to your career. It is far easier to make professional connections when you can say 'I'm Jane Boyer and I'm part of the management team for Core Gallery, I'd like to talk to you about...' As an individual artist, chances are you won't get your mouth to the chink in the door to say who you are.
You may think this next bit of advice is obvious, but I don't think it is; make friends with the people you connect with. All of my friends in London started as comment activity through the blogs. We have made the effort to meet in person, see art together, have a meal and a beer and just generally get to know each other better. It has been the most rewarding aspect of my whole trajectory out of isolation. All of my friends have fascinating lives, unique insight into art and make my time in London some of the happiest time I spend anywhere.
Remember that each step may be a small step, but it is a step forward and may bear greater fruit further down the road. Also, take strength from those who believe in you, they see what you can't see about yourself.
Congratulations to Rob Turner for his Culture Awards nomination! http://wildartintheblean.blogspot.com/
See Marion and Ros Davis, from Core Gallery, in the upcoming exhibition TWISTED
TWISTED - exhibition
A fresh encounter with contemporary craft
The exhibition focuses on work by seven artists who employ the traditional materials and techniques of textiles and ceramics, but manipulate and twist them into different forms, altered meanings and new directions. Wriggling out of the traditional domain of 'craft', these objects escape the plinth, shelf and glass cabinet, occupying the gallery as unconventional wall pieces and installations that you can walk through.
With Kay Aplin, Rosalind Davies, Rosie James, Marion Michell,
Karin Schosser, Isobel Smith, Alice Walton
July 23 - August 21, 2011
Wed - Sun 11am - 5pm
PREVIEW: Friday 22 July, 5 - 7 pm
For details see under:
http://www.phoenixarts.org/exhibitions/265-twisted.html
Address:
North Gallery
PHOENIX BRIGHTON
10-14 Waterloo Place
Brighton BN2 9NB
East Sussex
Telephone: +44 (0)1273 603700
Email: info@phoenixbrighton.org
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Thanks Hayley for both your comment and your compliment. Glad to see you here!
posted on 2011-07-17 by Jane Boyer
Thanks for your comments on my blog, weirdly enough I was just about to comment on here. Really inspiring post! Especially what you have written about artists' collectives.
posted on 2011-07-16 by Hayley Harrison
Yes, we do, in fact I have taken a great deal of pleasure in the serendipitous or should I say synchronous ways our minds work sometimes - both are accurate. I hope you can find something because I truly believe the effort is worth the connection. Let me know how you get on.
posted on 2011-07-15 by Jane Boyer
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-07-15 by David Riley
Hi David, I like the way we seem to usually end up next to each other in the list. It's like in high school and the alphabetical ordering system always sits you next to the same person - you can't help but start talking to one another.....yes, I am very lucky to have found a group of people willing to let me in and work around the difficulties of my distance. But with all the artist-led groups in the UK it is bound to be possible to find somewhere with like-minded people with whom to work, if one really wants to be a part of something.... and therein lies the crux, it is a lot of effort to develop and maintain friendships, hopefully the relationship is worth the effort and the effort is a pleasure - I have been lucky in that too. I also think one has to really want to move out of isolation, I know I did. I could not continue as I was and had to find a way to connect. All I can say is, this has worked for me.
posted on 2011-07-15 by Jane Boyer
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-07-15 by David Riley
[enlarge]
Jane Boyer, 'Notion of Requisites', mixed media on canvas, copyright 2011.
# 52 [1 August 2011]
Two questions have arisen for me from the reading I've been doing.
It seems that the current accepted view that we are entirely constructed by our surroundings is similar to the Judaeo-Christian concept of predetermination, God sets out our path so all things happen as they were meant to happen. But it seems to me, both completely take away any responsibility we may have to think for ourselves and choose. It struck me as odd that there would be this same constraint from two different and possibly mutually hostile systems - faith and science.
However, the argument that we can choose even though we have been constructed seems to me to be suspect because any choice would be a constructed choice and predictable based on the recognition that we have been totally constructed by society. The very fact of our construct means our choices are not our own either.
So what is our own?
The other thing which has crossed my mind is from contemplating this quote by Deleuze:
'I am forever unfolding between two folds and if to perceive means to unfold, then I am forever perceiving with in the folds.'
The very nature of the fold means that not everything is immediately knowable and shift happens because the folds move. So this would point to a shifting context too. 'Perceiving with in the fold' would naturally include a perception of context.
How do we find our center when everything shifts?
---------
It is summer holiday season in France and I have been doing a great deal of mindless, almost Zen, activities like ironing sheets, and making beds. This is the kind of stuff that runs through my head at times like these. I know, I need to take a pill and lie down, don't I?
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Hello Jon. I feel I have a curious perspective on 'forgiveness'. I see it as something wholly ecclesiastical and as such, something beyond my power to bestow. However, the question of whether or not to bear a grudge is certainly within my power and I think ultimately where the question of forgiveness resides. If the self is constructed there can be no choice, but we feel that we do have choice. So are we deluded or does choice exist in placing emphasis on certain past experiences which influences present decisions? All I can say about the meaning of the universe is, from my (our) point of view it seems meaningless, but then we don't have the full picture and can't know one way or the other. I think Deleuze would say it (the meaning of the universe and our perception/knowledge of it) exists between the folds and as shift happens our perceptions happen.
posted on 2011-08-14 by Jane Boyer
Hello Elena and David R - I hope you will forgive (on forgiveness, Jon, I'll comment separately) my tardiness in responding, I think my latest post explains. You're comments are spot on with regard to how we interact. We are our context and our context is us; which is the positive side of what I've said all along, that our context defines and obliterates at the same time. I think this contextual relationship is an important thing to realize, otherwise we merrily pass through life not being fully self-aware, even if it is more confusing and painful to be that self-aware.
posted on 2011-08-14 by Jane Boyer
Hello DavidR, Elena and Jon, thank you for your comments - they are really cool! And unfortunately, I find I am out of time again and cannot respond properly. I'll get back to you though, because you all raise very interesting points and I want to respond......I'll be back.
posted on 2011-08-11 by Jane Boyer
Hello Jane - this conundrum has been plaguing me recently, on the issue of forgiveness: if everyone is constructed, predetermined, then they are automatically doing the "best" and only thing they can ... thus, there is nothing to forgive. It suddenly becomes an easy, yet rather pointless, universe. Quantum Physics holds open the possibility of choice, but not the certainty of it ... Anyway, I have a year of blogs to catch up on, so you'll be hearing from me again soon, doubtless. Just to let you know that I'm back online and blogging again ...
posted on 2011-08-10 by Jon Bowen
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-08-03 by David Riley
how interesting David that you have found an engineering angle, because it fits you, mine was a sort of rambling conversation that follows those lines... ish... so... experience forces thought, language does not create thought... I can only experience things as the person I am... so... my thoughts can only be of/about me... The language is the performance/presentation of the thought... The language is produced by my body so only serves as an illustration or performance of me... shows my difference to others... so... by making art, I repeat this difference to create an encounter in the viewer, which forces more thought! does that work? David's equation was much more succinct, but as we both said, "I find it works for me!"
posted on 2011-08-03 by Elena Thomas
this is starting to hurt my poor little brain... What started out as a required bit of reading for my MA research has turned into something else. Having discovered that the way *I* think has been recognised and labelled, has made me very self -conscious of my so called choices. Am I doing this, in this way because that's how I have always thought and worked, or has reading about this way of thinking affected the way I do it? In thinking about the thinking, my mind has drifted from the subject matter of my research! I think having grasped a little of Deleuze, I now need to read all the stuff I started with all over again!
posted on 2011-08-03 by Elena Thomas
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-08-03 by David Riley
Hello Elena, David R and David M, thank you very much for your comments. Yes, it is true a mindless task is good for thought. I go so far as to say silence is good for thought too. I spend most of my time without exterior noise and think the better for it. It's interesting you mention about Deleuze's ideas fitting, Elena. What pops to mind is a question, do your motivations come from the shift in thought about the creative process which Deleuze has been so instrument in changing? As my friend Helen Scalway said once, he (Deleuze) is the grandfather of us all! David R, have you read 'The Fold' by Deleuze? If not, you may enjoy it because many of your comments are discussed in it. Deleuze talks about 'the event' and defines it not as a man being hit by a car, but rather the phenomenon of things coming into being because all variables have come together in a particular way. He says the pyramids are an event. It is a compelling concept. He also says that Leibniz, who is at the center of his discussion in 'The Fold', proposes point-of-view as replacing a 'universe with a center' - I equate that with our sense of personal center, which is suggested by the recommendation of the very individual term 'point-of-view' - and is what you are suggesting. David M, yes, I would agree, however I think in the idea of 'freedom of choice' the emphasis is more on the concept of 'freedom' rather than 'choice' and as such I think it is a kind of disguise for the fact that our choices are manifested influences. The paradox I see is that our center is our self (point-of-view), but our self has been constructed by our surroundings. My question remains, what is our own? The best I can arrive at are the 'choices' we make to place influences in relation which give meaning to our lives, something I think David R, you are saying.
posted on 2011-08-03 by Jane Boyer
Hello Jane. Freedom of choice implies the paradox of freedom to not choose? If the idea of freedom of choice means anything, it is that we live the paradox? Our center finds US?
posted on 2011-08-03 by David Minton
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-08-01 by David Riley
No, I disagree! The mindless task is a wonderful aid to thought! Both David Minton and I have mentioned the meditative nature of repetition lately. I'm also really glad to find other artists blogging who are contemplating Deleuze, as it has really helped me understand some of what he has written. I'm particularly mindful of how those ideas "fit" me and my work and my motivations for working as an artist.
posted on 2011-08-01 by Elena Thomas
[enlarge]
Jane Boyer, 'Trans...', oil, ink, acrylic, collage, graphite, pastel, gesso on panel, copyright 2011.
# 53 [14 August 2011]
'Fractured' is the word most in my thoughts lately for lots of reasons. The other day after a particularly intense session on social media networks, I had my first real experience of feeling fractured. It wasn't a pleasant feeling.
I've also started the curating process for our Core Gallery Open. Rosalind Davis kindly invited me to co-curate the show with her. It is a pleasure to contemplate the works selected for the exhibition. An interesting thing has surfaced; many of the artists speak of a 'fractured' kind of experience from the barrage of technology and media. It is visible in the work.
Certainly, the recent riot events around the UK have kept the word 'fractured' active in my mind.
I'm also feeling fractured in my personal life because we, my husband and I, are making a major move; we're moving into our own house. It's a particularly poignant event because our move coincides with the selling of the house where we have been care-takers for the past four years. This house belongs to an elderly lady, soon to be 100 years old. I'm helping to sort through and move this lady's household as well as our own.
It's a strange thing to decide in a second what has value and what does not. I find it hard enough to do with my own things, but with another's belongings it's frankly eerie; setting aside the sentiments to look at the stern money value.
The memories, the meaning, the expressions, the sentiments are all laid to rest, swept away in an instant of placing an object in a pile of categorization - this pile goes to the tip, this to the family, this pile to anyone who will take it.
It's interesting the things that go to the family; photographs, pipes, wallets, hats, desks, walking canes, cameras, favourite chairs, binoculars etc. They are often things that recall an individual; tools of favourite activities, well used accessories, paraphernalia of habits, images frozen in time, places where the person sat or worked. These things trigger memories; perhaps even resurrect the touch or smell of someone dear.
The intensity of memory these things stimulate in us come from touching the objects our loved one touched. We're reminded of how they carried things or themselves, how they walked, how they sat, how they gazed, how they concentrated. We're reminded of the life we saw unfolding before us. This sounds like Rowland Barthes in Camera Lucida; 'I was looking at the eyes who had looked into the eyes of the Dali Lama,' to paraphrase. I think I need to read that book again.
Is it art? Sure, why not. But art will never convey the deep intense feeling of holding once again a thing that once belonged. I wonder if this is the ultimate limitation of art?
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Yes, it makes absolute sense and is very well put. It is fascinating that we project and imbue objects with meaning, as you say. I wonder why it is we do that? Thanks Susan for an interesting discussion.
posted on 2011-08-15 by Jane Boyer
I think perhaps it's possible to reach the threshold with artwork but to always fall short. The experience of holding such an object and the rush of emotions, memories, responses through all the senses, is surely always momentary - of course these will remain but not with the intensity with which they flood us in that moment - it is the attempt to fix this that perhaps is the point where art reaches it's limits. It is interesting to consider that this experience is projected onto the object, the object carries none of this history within itself, and passed to another is potentially valueless - but perhaps this is where art can fix more of that experience, or rather draw something universal from it (although it may never totally become it) and carry that to the next person - does that make sense?
posted on 2011-08-15 by Susan Francis
Hi Susan, thanks so much for your comment. Yes, we do aim to reside on that line of tension, most certainly. Given all the things you mention, which I agree are possible, do you think it is possible to convey that intensely personal mix of feelings, the loss, the pain, the joy, the love, the warmth from holding something which once belonged to someone you loved? I ask not in challenge but sincerely wondering. I think we could come close by resemblance, meaning an expression of something we all experience, but to actually capture and express the full reality of that feeling? It is so uniquely ours, I don't know how it could be conveyed except as a universal. It's an interesting question to contemplate...Your story of children smelling to identify reminded me instantly of when I was a child. One of my friends had the most curious smell to her hair - I remember that smell to this day!
posted on 2011-08-14 by Jane Boyer
I think it certainly is an area of limitation, but the edge of the limitation is exactly what we attempt to tight rope walk along, - it can be about the thing, communicate it, the feeling, the relationship - to object, to person, to space, but isn't the line of tension where the artist aims to reside? Mentioning the smell of things reminded me, in school when an unnamed school sweat shirt is found and held up to the class for identification, immediately it's passed round for smelling and after consultation they announce 'Ah yes, it's so and so's', - a fool proof method, I love the way children are so primal and instinctive. How much we lose by growing up.
posted on 2011-08-14 by Susan Francis
[enlarge]
Jane Boyer, 'What can I see no one else will - detail 2', shipping box, found pigment, copyright 2011.
[enlarge]
Jane Boyer, 'What can I see no one else will - detail 1', shipping box, found pigment, copyright 2011.
[enlarge]
Jane Boyer, 'What can I see no one else will', shipping box, found pigment, copyright 2011.
# 54 [12 September 2011]
It really is remarkable when things converge.
'Image-breaking retained the sense that each element retained its own vivid specificity but took a step a back from the final lightning strike of illumination which would hold them all together in understanding. Image-breaking was the perpetual delay of illumination: intelligibility was held in abeyance through the unresolved relationship of parts to wholes. It is the lack of transcendence, the permanent uncertainty of any resolution, which propels New Brutalism back into the world as a form of ethical realism.'[1]
This has been circulating in my mind for weeks as I carry on with the rest of the madness on my plate at the moment.
I found this definition came to the forefront of my thoughts as I considered the work chosen for The Core Gallery Open which I will be co-curating with Ros Davis in ten days. Without giving too much away (you'll have to come see the show!), new painting in the UK is right on target with this quote. Here is a link for more information on the show: http://www.coregallery.co.uk/current-exhibition/
As I continued to sort through my studio yesterday (each day of sorting propels our move forward and is the reason for my madness at the moment) I uncovered the box pictured here. It is an 'as found' piece which is another connection to New Brutalism and Paolozzi in particular. It moves me, (sorry, no pun intended) and as I consider whether I should interact with this box, changing or altering it, my inner voice screams 'NO!' So I claim it as it is, something unusual for me in my work.
Earlier today I read a really great interview with Moby by Kyra Kordoski[2] in Whitehot Magazine, and this quote struck me: "What can you take a picture of that no one else will see?" This is something Moby's photographer uncle taught him about photography and which resonated with me because of my background in photography. It was a fresh active memory when I saw this box again today in the studio. This photographic quote conflates poignantly in my mind with the image-breaking quote to become a notion of 'what do I see that no one else will?' This is not to suggest others would not have the capacity to see what I see, but rather it highlights the fact that we each are absolutely separated from each other's thoughts, we are isolated with our own interior workings. We empathize, understand, communicate and sometimes hate but we never cross that threshold of absolute awareness of another's interior thoughts. At best we guess. I see this 'guess' as what they were circling around with New Brutalism. This 'guess' underlies all of our attempts to communicate and is the reason, I believe, we use symbols to convey meaning in language - all language.
This is one of those things I've known all my life, one of those things which founds my worldview, but something which only struck like lightning today because of a particular convergence of ideas at a particular time. It's one of those things that make me feel the electricity of living.
.................
I'll also be part of a panel discussion on blogging presented by Andrew Bryant on 22nd September at Core Gallery. In preparing for this, Andrew has made me aware of how my engagement with reading informs my work. This awareness is also in the mix. He said, 'You seem to use the space to work over, rehearse and pull together the various texts you are engaged in as part of your visual practice. In this sense your blog is much closer to the academic/professional model of the contemporary artist, whereby your practice is 'informed' by your reading. Because of this your blog is the way in to a deeper, more complex understanding of your practice.'
Thank you Andrew, I'm really looking forward to the first Artist Talking event. Here is a link for more information: http://www.coregallery.co.uk/diy-educate/ , there are still spaces available if you would like to hear more.
[1] Ben Highmore, "Image-breaking, God-making': Paolozzi's Brutalism", October 136, Spring 2011, MIT Press, p.99
[2] Kyra Kordoski, "DESTROYED: Moby the Whitehot Interview", Whitehot, September 2011, found at: http://whitehotmagazine.com/articles/2011-destroyed-moby-whitehot-interview/2364
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-09-18 by David Riley
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-09-18 by David Riley
No problem, I hope you can come back to me with some thoughts. There is a lot to think about here, no doubt. Cheers.
posted on 2011-09-18 by Jane Boyer
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-09-14 by David Riley
[enlarge]
# 55 [18 September 2011]
This is going to be my new studio...
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Dear Elena, David and Rob, thank you for your comments. Please, please forgive this extremely tardy response. I think the post above will explain why....Two things about my new studio space, it is very well insulated and so should be comfortable, it was during the heat of this summer anyway, we'll see what the winter brings. And the space is huge but the door - the only door is small, even I have to duck. It's like entering the half floor in 'Being John Malcovitch' so this one feature will dictate all my production! I think I was deciding to go smaller for a while anyway because trying to transport big work to London is a real struggle.
posted on 2011-10-16 by Jane Boyer
It will interesting to see Jane how the working space effects what you make? How much influence does location have? Workshops being toataly practical places whether in a 250 year old stone built farm outbuilding looking over the loire valley or a corragated industrial unit with no windows in a faceless place on the outskirts of any town.
posted on 2011-09-22 by Rob Turner
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-09-18 by David Riley
oh jealous!
posted on 2011-09-18 by Elena Thomas
[enlarge]
our stuff stored in 'bay 1'.
[enlarge]
Jane Boyer, 'a flush mechanism, from the Encyclopedia of Wherewithall, sketchbook project 2012', ink on paper, copyright 2011.
# 56 [16 October 2011]
The move from hell is finished.
It took two months to organize and prepare, 18 full trailer-load trips to the tip, countless carloads back and forth between the two houses moving small stuff, a week of cleaning which in the end wasn't finished and three panel truck loads to move our furniture.
My back suffered, our car broke down during the last and most crucial push, which meant two, four hour round trips to Angouleme to the car dealership when we could least afford the time. And we thought our eighteen year old cat was going to die during the process. To say we were stressed would be an understatement.
Happily, the cat is happy as Larry, the car is running better than ever and we are sitting atop a pile of stuff thinking we should become brocanteurs; all it would take would be a new sign with open for business hours. Our belongings are stored in 'Bay 1' and 'Bay 2' of our downstairs and it looks just like a depot vente with all the white appliances on one side, furniture piled high and bric-brac down the back. I think we won't go there.
I'm very ready to get back to work.
Speaking of work, the trip to London in September was fab! It was a very rushed trip but the Core Gallery Open which I co-curated with Ros Davis was a big success - I think it was the largest PV crowd we've had. The Artist Talking blog workshop was a success too with near full capacity. It really was wonderful to meet everyone. It gives me such encouragement and validation to discover people are responding positively to the things I do; it really is such a boost and a reminder that isolation is transient.
Even though as I write this, I'm still without internet, I have been working on several other projects and the clean-up has started in my new studio, hopefully I'll be painting again soon; it has been a long fallow summer. In this fallowness and on my husband's suggestion that I draw more, I'm taking part in the Art House Coop Sketchbook Project. It is a really great idea; this is the second year of the project. It is in conjunction with the Brooklyn Art Museum Library and all the sketchbooks returned by the deadline go on a world tour then become part of the permanent collection. It costs $25 to participate and an extra $20 to digitize your sketchbook. Each artist selects a title topic from a list of topics provided by Art House, such as 'Encyclopedia of', they send you a sketchbook and you're off from there. The title of my sketchbook is 'The Encyclopedia of Wherewithall'. To find out more go to: www.thesketchbookproject.com the deadline for sign up is 31st October 2011.
Now I just have to find the teapot and remember where I put the tea.....
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
...and that's why your my pal!!
posted on 2011-10-21 by Jane Boyer
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-10-21 by David Riley
Hi Elena and David, thanks for your comments. Thanks Elena for the link to Hazel Jones, what a delight! I'm glad you like my little drawing. This contraption graces my backside every day - it is like no other toilet I've ever seen. David, you sceptic! Think of all the people who are going to see my little sketchbook - well who hopefully will see my little sketchbook. Like your seeds, who knows what may come. But I do agree with you, it may be hard to part with it. In fact, I think I've already decided to keep this drawing and put a copy in the sketchbook. I don't want to fold it!
posted on 2011-10-18 by Jane Boyer
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-10-18 by David Riley
Hi Jane, glad to see you now able to settle in to your new space. I love your "Flush mechanism" drawing. There was something about the proportions of it and the shapes that reminded me of Hazel Jones' work... http://www.thenewartgallerywalsall.org.uk/search/?creator=Jones%2C+Hazel&what=collection particularly her currant steamer!
posted on 2011-10-17 by Elena Thomas
[enlarge]
# 57 [25 October 2011]
Art critic pair launches Rebecca - a comprehensive writing service for artists, artist-led groups, galleries, and arts organizations - with a free, Twitter advice session on 9 November at 6pm GMT / 1pm EST.
Art professionals Becky Hunter and Jane Boyer have upped the ante for independence with the creation of Rebecca, an arts writing service designed to support the independent arts practitioner. Based on their complementary skills, experience and expertise, Rebecca offers a wide range of specialist services, from press release writing and PDF layout, to essay writing, assistance with artist and curatorial statements, and consultation on business writing.
Becky explains, "As the commercial gallery world becomes ever more exclusive, proactive artists and artist-led initiatives take increasing responsibility for their own self-promotion, critical reception and career development. It makes sense to work with an experienced writer to bring polish and sparkle to your press releases, to encapsulate the creative force and vision in your business documents, and to highlight the years of hard-earned, in-depth knowledge of your practice in your catalogue essays."
To this end, the free Twitter Q&A session offers artists, creative entrepreneurs, and arts professionals an opportunity to draw upon the Rebecca team's know-how. Questions on all aspects of art writing, press releases and marketing strategy, artist statements, blogging, and critical essay writing will be answered. The online launch also provides a chance simply to interact with Becky and Jane, and to find out whether their skills and services are a good fit with your needs. Connect with @RebeccaProjects before and during the event using the hashtag #AskRebecca.
Becky is a regular contributor to Art Papers and Sculpture, and an independent researcher with an AHRC funded Masters in History of Art. Jane is an artist, critic, curator, and committed peripatetic, who frequently reviews exhibitions for whitehotmagazine.com. Both writers have formal Fine Art training and sustain meaningful art practices. "As working arts professionals, Becky and I understand the importance and often the complexity involved in creating texts for a professional art practice. Because we understand, we want to help," says Jane.
Rebecca's writers are great listeners who will collaborate with you to produce the text you envision. Elizabeth Murton, an artist and curator at Core Gallery, London, says, "Jane has an ability to help you focus ideas in the text, structuring information in a clear, readable, and engaging way. Her arts and business background gives her a unique perspective to assess the audience and impact of the writing, which compliments her knowledge and love of art."
Rebecca: Key information
Launch Information: 9 November, 6-8pm GMT | Twittter @RebeccaProjects #AskRebecca
Web: http://rebeccaprojects.net | Email: enquiries@rebeccaprojects.net
Phone: Becky +1 215-317-0907 | Jane +33 546704225
Services: Press releases, catalogue essays, artist & curatorial statements, business writing, editing
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Oh, and thanks for the tip on Grayson Perry, that sounds really interesting, I'll look it up.
posted on 2011-10-27 by Jane Boyer
Thanks Rob! That is the very thing, trying to supply what is expected can be dodgy, often back-firing. I think also, many artists feel they shouldn't or couldn't afford to work with a professional writer when in fact it may be worth it to have a text which presents a different voice to the rest of a portfolio.
posted on 2011-10-27 by Jane Boyer
Hi Jane, I think artists are often intimidated by writing and thats why they are artists not writers. The art world requires artists to write even if they dont really want to and what often comes out is something that the artist thinks is required using language that the artist thinks is expected. On the subject of artists writings.....Grayson Perry has explained and provided insights into the world art creation using text in shortish parragraphs to accompany his exhibition at the British Museum. I think he will have made contemporary art accessable and understandable to thousands and thousands of people with his accompanying texts. The combination of text explaining the artifact and resulting art... I'm so impressed.
posted on 2011-10-26 by Rob Turner
Hi David and Susan, thank you very much! I really appreciate your good wishes. Cheers!
posted on 2011-10-26 by Jane Boyer
sounds great - wishing you lots of success
posted on 2011-10-25 by Susan Francis
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-10-25 by David Riley
[enlarge]
Jane Boyer, 'Framed Debate', oil, acrylic, graphite, picture frame on prepared canvas, copyright 2011.
# 58 [20 November 2011]
I've always felt the artist's ability to know when to stop an intriguing thing and one of the signals in defining an artist, although I know some artists do struggle with knowing when to stop. An artist friend back in The States told me once that he observed his child in a group of other children during a painting workshop for kids. Each child was painting a picture, he noticed his son reached a point and stopped while the other kids just kept painting until they were told to stop. He found it significant and I had to agree.
The completion of something is an important boundary; it contains the statement that anything more would be superfluous, unnecessary and an annoyance running the risk of ruining all that came before. It signals not an end but the wholeness of something.
It is with these thoughts that I have decided to stop. I have been writing this blog for a year and half or so and it is about one year ago I participated in my first group exhibition with Core Gallery which marked the beginning of a fruitful journey out of isolation, one which I'm still on I'm happy to say; a journey made possible by Artists Talking. I've said before and I'll say again any success I have relates back to this blog on a-n. That journey is the very reason I'm making the decision to stop this blog. With the launch of Rebecca, I'm now entering a new phase in my artistic life, one which is no longer isolated. It is time to stop working in isolation but my dialog with history will never end.
My sincere wishes of good luck and heart-felt thanks to a-n and everyone who joined me here discussing many fascinating topics, as well as to those who read the things we talked about. I am very grateful for your engagement with my thoughts and the trust you showed me by sharing yours. As my friend and fellow artist Elizabeth Murton said recently, 'This is, of course, not farewell, but see you soon!'
All the Best,
Jane
Login to post a comment »
Comments on this post
Thank you very much for you kind comment Jon. Yes, I too have missed many of your posts due to demands, but I've read enough to know you are/were going through some very difficult things. I hope life is being kinder to you now. I have no idea what a light-field camera is but I will read your blog. Cheers!
posted on 2011-12-16 by Jane Boyer
Hi Jane - I've missed a lot of your blog entries due to the demands of daily life ... I will catch up in due course, but glad the tone of this last post is so immensely positive. This comment is completely off-task: I've just come across the concept of a light-field camera, and am bowled over by the possibilities this presents. I'm wondering if other artists have come across this development, and what their reactions are ... please have a look at my latest blog post for more info.
posted on 2011-12-11 by Jon Bowen
Hi David, yes once again my post came in next to yours when I published it - it's funny how that has happened so often, I came to expect to be near you in the queue and I was never disappointed. We have had some wonderful discussions here. Thank You. And yes, your instinct is right I will be back soon...
posted on 2011-11-23 by Jane Boyer
Thank you very much Hayley. Yes, you'll be seeing me soon. The best of luck to you, it's been lovely to see you unfold in your own right.
posted on 2011-11-23 by Jane Boyer
Comment removed by the writer [7 July 2012]
posted on 2011-11-23 by David Riley
Sad to see Working in Isolation ending, but sure we will see you around. Good luck with Rebecca- fantastic idea.
posted on 2011-11-22 by Hayley Harrison
Thanks so much Kate. I have enjoyed writing this blog more than I could have imagined and it has been amazing to find people have responded so positively to it. This wasn't an easy decision but it feels right and I have to trust that. Now I just have to get busy on the next one!
posted on 2011-11-21 by Jane Boyer
How strange that within minutes of publishing my first ever post to a blog, your post should come through, relaying your decision to end yours! I understand your reasons for ending it but just wanted to let you know that I was inspired by your blog while it lasted.
posted on 2011-11-20 by Kate Murdoch