A rich and timely resource for all working in the
visual arts
Ruth Claxton examines the changing aspirations of artist-led spaces.
I recently spent two weeks in Melbourne undertaking a research and development residency with artist Kelly Large at the invitation of Ocular Lab, an artist-led space in the north of the city. Whilst there, we operated as art tourists visiting and talking to a wide range of artists, curators and spaces, infiltrating, navigating and utilising the complex networks of groups and individuals we uncovered. Melbourne is the undisputed, heavyweight champion of artist-led activity in Australia with a long history of influential projects and initiatives. Space is relatively cheap, there is a large community of artists, graduates stay in the city and the standard of living is good. However, as we met more people and saw more artist-led initiatives (and in such a short time we only really got a snapshot), we were struck by a number of apparent anomalies. The overwhelmingly predominant model is the clean, white cube gallery space, run by a committee of artists and often with a longstanding director, mimicking the structures and organisation of the institution. This seems remarkable given that there is little funding available and that, even in the most established spaces, it is...
and access all Knowledge Bank and Publication articles click here » to subscribe online - from only £6.
If you are a subscriber please login here.