My current practice develops my research into Printmaking 2.0 to negotiate new media and digital technologies within old print technologies such as etching.

At present I am researching the notion of the melted matrix within printmaking to develop works that situate the body between the print and the screen. Working with the body as both a source of data and means of data capture I am forming the creation of Live printing to use the information superhighway to stream live prints through the Internet to explore the connected post-human body.

Life is absurd, and sometimes so is my work – let’s go on with our conversation.


Live print preparation (Photo: Skye Couzens)

Lately I’ve been feeling on edge about the degree show, I don’t mean anxious, I mean literally thinking about the edge. Allow me to expand; both screens and prints have edges, edges which exist both in the actual and virtual (in a Deleuzian sense). The specifics of the edge are mediated by the media used, for example with an intaglio print such as an etching, the edge is defined by an embossed frame, caused by the edge of the print matrix making an impression on the printed paper. Whereas the screen edge is less easily defined as the edge is becoming increasingly subtle to merge in the case of the iPhone* into the hand to encompass the eyes beholding it.

After reading Liquid Modernity (Bauman, 2000) earlier in the year I’ve been playing with the notion of the liquid print, a print in a constant state of flux. In Liquid Modernity Zygmunt Bauman explores the ‘fluidity’ of contemporary social life through five key issues: emancipation, individuality, time/space, work and community. In short Bauman argues that modern society is in a state of liquefaction as society melts from the continual pursuit of a new order to replace a more ‘solid’ previous order. The solid social structures with the advent of new digital technologies have become liquefied and fluid as the information flow provided by the Internet and other technologies have enhanced mobility and speed of communication.

In order to achieve this liquid state I’ve become drawn to the digital in order to achieve a print that can be both solid and liquid, actual and virtual. It seemed only natural to investigate the creation of a biotic print as working with animate materials would ensure that the print is able to constantly evolve. Voila, Live Art. The use of the body as a site in which to allow space for creation immediately ignited a leap in my print practice. I have always perceived traditional print techniques such as etching to be ritualistic as the print process dances on the boundaries of a ritualistic performance with a print output at the end almost operating as an index of the body melting around the print matrix.

Live Art became the frame and agent in which to allow further experimentation and action research to discover the placement of the body, and self in relation to both the screen and reality. The blurring of the distinction between the hyperreal and real is melted by the print matrix. Baltic Signs is an example of what I have coined a Live Print to offer a fluid exchange between the actual and virtual to explore both virtual and actual forms of embodiment of print, below is a breakdown of the Live Print process:


Baltic Signs explores the positioning of the self in relation to the screen and how we have become immersed in a series of layered screens. Our existence has become overlayed and superimposed with different networks which we connect with, the Live Print; Baltic Signs allows the physical presence of the body to reclaimed and pulled back from the absorption of the screen.

In an increasingly digital world more emphasis is being guided towards our electronic footprint and the meta-data we cast away as we surf our way through the seemingly infinite Internet.  Within Live Printing the body replaces the traditional print matrix in which to highlight the absorption of the self into the network. A digital distance is created in performing the Live Print via a live stream, when accessed online the Live Print takes on a new lens to be experienced. Agency is transformed by the screen and engagement is manipulated by our absorption of the pixel. The Live Print is only accessible online when printed/performed live, once printed the live stream is terminated in order to ensure that the Print can only be disseminated live.

Critic RoseLee Goldberg alludes to a frustration with established art forms, I too have felt this frustration with the fixed traditional definition of print;

“The history of performance art in the twentieth century is the history of a permissive, open-ended medium with endless variables, executed by artists impatient with the limitations of more established art forms, and determined to take their art directly to the public. For this reason its base has always been anarchic.”

(Goldberg, 2004, p.3 in Blocker, 2004)


Since opening up my print practice to new digital technologies I have felt this frustration dissolve as through my research into Live Art I have been able to expose my print practice directly to the public or in the case of Live Printing to a digital public. I have utilised the material manifestations of print within the virtual through my use of live streaming. The work is printed within the edges of the print matrix which audiences experience the Live Print through, this could be a mobile device, projection, desktop etc.

The use of the body within Live Art creates a machine for desire as the values placed upon the body supersede commerce and material gain that would be present in for example painting. The somatic language arising from the presence of the body in Live Printing focuses attention between the collapse of the actual and virtual. Writer Rob Horning argues that; “With the advent of digital communication technology, the real and the virtual have collapsed into each other. Images now seem like reality itself, the substance of experience, not just representations of it.” (Horning, 2016, p.65) By preventing the Live Print from being documented and only existing as a live act, there is the erasure of the potential of the body becoming an image.

In attempting to research any previous existence or forms of Live Printing I became interested in the body politic. The body is an overarching power within the Live Prints I have undertaken thus far and so I decided to explore other artist’s use of the body as a print matrix. Vito Acconci’s body as a matrix within the series Trademarks (1970) is intriguing, the matrix is a tool for representation, a screen for printing another reality. Vito Acconci (1940-) constructs a corporeal form of printing and describes the process as; “Biting myself: biting as much of my body as I can reach. Applying printers’ ink to the bites: stamping bite prints on various surfaces.” (Acconci, 1972, p.11) The body is objectified to some extent as Acconci seems to attempt to break the wall of flesh embodying the self in a frame, and then contorts the body in order to achieve a print.  In traditional etching an acid is used in order to bite the matrix, in Trademarks Acconci literally bites the matrix/body.


Vito Acconci (1970) Trademarks [lithograph on paper] 20.125 × 20.1875 inches Available at: (Accessed: 3 April 2016)

 When referring to the telematic embrace I’m not alluding to hugging an iPhone, however it is always with some horror that all falls silent when an iPhone hits the floor, as if when our technology deteriorates so do we. When the inevitable splintering of the screen on the iPhone occurs our reflection in its glossy screen is fractured losing both the edge and our recognition of the digital (ideal) self. Within my Live Print I don’t know either (2016) I wanted to highlight how the human heart is a machine in continuous operation until it no longer ceases to function. Its existence is binary – it is on or off. With this in mind our lives have become ruled by binary operations and we are now controlled by the machines we created and we have come a long way from the telematics embrace that Roy Ascott alludes to in the; Telematic Embrace (2003).

Philosopher of Phenomenology, Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961) raises an intriguing dilemma in the Phenomenology of Perception (1945); “Why is our body for us the mirror of our being…?” (Ponty, 2000, p. 171). The anxiety of the mirror reflection or the reprinted body in an actual reflection is not distorted, unless the body is perceived via the Lacanian mirror. The mirror becomes a source of fear, however we have greater control over our virtual mirror, and therefore screen based mirrors are reflecting the ideal self, distorting our true subject/object relation in the real world.


Thinking about Lacan’s Mirror Stage by applying theory to the iPhone

Within The Ecstasy of Communication (1988) Baudrillard argues that the subject is always close to instant information as we are always in close relation to some sort of information network as the subject; “becomes a pure screen a pure absorption and re-absorption surface of the influent networks” (Baudrillard, 2012, p.30). This suggests that we have become a number, an extension to the binary 0s and 1s and chained to the code we have programmed to serve us. Our bodies are now swimming in an information flow as the screen functions as a hyperreal simulatory mirror not representing our reflection as a standard mirror but acting as a gateway to connect the self within a teleological theatre.

The body is in a sense a truly unknowable object, as we embody the self we remain tangled in a conflict concerning a constant anxiety of not knowing. The screen sets to blow apart the Mind/Body duality René Descartes was obsessed with (Descartes, 1641 in 2008, p.9) as we have become split between self, screen and embodiment as we become increasingly embedded in the digital. Technology has manipulated our perception of time and borrowed our thought to the extent that Artificial Intelligence is invading our everyday. Machines are learning from our imperfections to the extent they now correct us without us knowing. I’ll pause for a moment to allow you to reconcile any awkward autocorrect messages you have received or even sent, because your device thought it was one step ahead of you…


Struggles every iPhone user faces (2016) Available at: (Accessed: 1 April 2016).

The machine has become a metonym for the presence of the body, and our skin has been transposed to a sleek aluminium finish as proxy politics pervade the body our machines exist as surrogates of the self. Technology has become a portal to transport flesh into a virtual desire away from the alienation of contemporary reality. Sociologist Zygmunt Bauman (1925-) comments; “Unlike ‘real relationships’, ‘virtual relationships’ are easy to enter and exit. They look smart and clean, feel easy to use, when compared with the heavy, slow-moving, messy real stuff.” (Bauman, 2003, p.37) As we happily hyperlink our way around the web a synergy between the perceiver and the perceived plasticises as the body becomes blended and according to theorist Margo DeMello; “If anything, the human body is now plastic. It is malleable; we can make it into what we like, freeing it ultimately from the constraints of our biology…” (DeMello, 2014, p.307) leading the plastic body to melt within a virtual prism to consider and experience reality.

New digital technologies are dislocating contemporary art practice from postmodern ideals as artists provoke audiences with increasingly interdisciplinary borderless practices. The impermanence of performance/live work posits at its centre an aesthetic paradigm of the positioning of the body. The use of the body as a tool for experiencing the world around us is being modified to embed new technologies to improve our existing organs. A key example is the development of the Oculus Rift which offers the opportunity to print ourselves in any virtual location. The living body is continually in receipt of technologies that have become transplanted into our lives which Oculus describe as;

The magic of presence: Rift’s advanced display technology combined with its precise, low-latency constellation tracking system enables the sensation of presence – the feeling as though you’re actually there. The magic of presence changes everything. You’ve never experienced immersion like this.


Oculus Rift in action (2016) Available at: (Accessed: 3 April 2016)

This immersion that Oculus allude to rings of an escape into a true hyperreality that sociologist Jean Baudrillard (1929-2007) would be proud of.

In “Text of pleasure” theorist Roland Barthes writes: “the text that contents, fills, grants euphoria; the text that comes from culture and does not break with it, is linked to a comfortable practice of reading.” A traditional etching print such as my recent print Medis Informacija (2015) (see below) could therefore be read as a Text of pleasure as the print would very much be rooted in a fixed comfortable process. However a Live Print, such as the recent Swans on Heroin (2016) (see below for documentation) could be perceived to be what Barthes refers to as a “Text of bliss” which Barthes describes as; “the text that imposes a state of loss, the text that discomforts (perhaps to the point of a certain boredom), unsettles the reader’s historical, cultural, psychological assumptions, the consistency of his tastes, values, memories, brings to a crisis his relation with language.” (Barthes, trans. Miller, 1975, p. 14) Therefore it could be deduced that Live Printing confronts our current crisis and relationship with language in a way that a traditional print forms could not.


Media Informacija in progress (click image for slideshow)

Emily Godden & Audit Chaos (2015) Medis Informacija I [Etching print] 59.4 x 84.1 cm

Emily Godden & Audit Chaos (2016) Swans on Heroin [Live Print] Photograph: Stephen Neale Johnson

Our embodied experience of the world has become very apparent to me during the traditional print process through the sheer physicality of winding the matrix through the press, applying ink, removing ink etc. The process has a brutality that is somewhat dirtier and slower than the technological injections that I have begun to play with. For example I have experimented using a laser cutter to engrave a matrix for an intaglio process which has removed the presence of the hand as the etching needle was substituted for the laser.


Scan of laser engraved drypoint matrix and print side by side

Screenshot to show software used to control the laser cutter

In reclaiming digital alienation by grounding the self in the real and immersing the body and not the mind in the digital the body has been forced to collapse under the noise of the screen. Through Live Printing I am attempting to release the body from the seduction of the screen. Printmaking is an old technique and media that is becoming increasingly distanced from contemporary art practice. New digital technologies are overthrowing techniques such as lithography, etching and woodblock printing. Instead of disregarding the heritage of print I am reclaiming the techniques and processes to embed them within a digital framework which recycles traditional approaches to print pioneered by the likes of Rembrandt van Rijn (1609-1669) and Albrecht Dürer (1471- 1528) and frames print within the present day.

Albrecht Dürer (1513) Knight, Death, and the Devil [Engraving] 24.3 x 18.8 cm, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.  Available at: Accessed 2 April 2016 (Accessed: 3 April 2016)

Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn (1641) The Windmill [Etching with touches of Drypoint] with 14.5 x 20.8 cm. Available at: (Accessed 3 April 2016)

Our reality is blended between the actual and virtual as we recycle digital and physical elements into a hyperreal landscape saturated by information and mediated by data gatekeepers. We have reached a crisis of representation and now we exist by reprinting the self within virtual environments. Through Live Printing I am attempting to reclaim a digital identity by grounding the self and the body in the real/physical. By streaming the body using a live feed the body is recycled electronically and broadcast online to be claimed by users of the Internet.

Screenshot showing live stream in action

By utilising live streaming services such as USTREAM I have been exploring the very public domain of the Internet by opening up Live Printing to be accessible to more than one audience. The audience becomes both an actual audience and a distant virtual audience courtesy of the Internet which is according to writer Rachel Greene; “Both everyday and exotic, public and private, autonomous and commercial, the internet is a chaotic, diverse and crowded form of contemporary public space.” (Greene, 2004, p.8)

The virtual is the condition for real experience, but it has no identity; identities of the subject and object are products of processes that resolve, integrate, or actualize a differential field. Therefore the virtual is read as the genesis of real experience, with chance being a mechanism to actualize a system to generate work within a process led framework of production. Live Printing exploits the virtual/actual gap where the body limits and physically grounds the self, therefore the virtual opens up a new dimension for the self to exist which is free of physical limitations. The matrix has been melted and its form deterritorialised in order to frame printmaking within our present day obsession with new technologies. Over the coming weeks I hope to further explore Live Printing and hope to reterritorialise print as I build towards my degree show installation; The Experimental Village 2.0 .




Acconci, V. (1972) ‘Body as Place – Moving in on Myself, Performing Myself’, Avalanche (Autumn) p.11.

Ascott, R. and Shanken, E.A. (2003) Telematic embrace; visionary theories of art, technology, and consciousness. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Barthes, R. Trans Miler, R (1975) The Pleasure of the Text. New York: Hill and Wang.

Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bauman, Z. (2003) Liquid Love. Cambridge: Polity Press. p.37

DeMello, M. (2014) Body studies: an introduction. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Descartes, R. (2008) Meditations and Other Metaphysical Writings. London: Penguin Books.

Greene, R. (2004) Internet Art. London: Thames & Hudson.

Horning, R. (2016) ‘The Digital Dilemma’, Art in America, 812, p.65.

Ponty, M. (2000) Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Colin Smith. London: Routledge.


*Other smart phones are available




Following a tutorial with artist Kimberley Foster back in February I decided to consolidate some of my thinking.



  • Language of practice
  • Temperature
  • When the work humms
  • Process
  • Scan vs. Print (the difference)
  • Diagrammatic process
  • Mapping (visual)
  • Research orientated
  • Objects/works as outputs or by products of research
  • Venn diagrams
  • Magic
  • Diagram as more complicated than the theory/item that it explains but created as a means/device for understanding the theory
  • Live stream
  • Flow chart – idea that can go forward but can’t always go back (irrevocable moments in process)
  • Hypothetical structure – accepting the unknown/chance output
  • Role of instruction and rules within process/work generation



–          Context in which situate the work

–          Lens use to frame the work

–          Presence of the haptic

–          Negation of the mechanical in favour of the haptic

–          Data transposition

–          What is the difference between the employment of the haptic over the mechanical (within the print process consider how technology could transform the process, e.g. laser cutter to prepare etching plate_ consider the use of a live data stream within laser cutter)



–          Is the sound output the work or is it the process? Or both? What is the work?

–          How much do you want the viewer/spectator to know? What do they need to know? How does not knowing/knowing change the work?

Ok, so we covered a lot of ground and the tutorial was really useful as I was beginning to really get to what it is was about printmaking that made me tick. A key trigger point in the discussion was what is the difference between a print and a scan?



This led me to think not just about the differences between printing and scanning but about the similarities and what happens if the two are overlayed. To use a Deleuzian term, what happens if the scan and print are deterritorialised?


So Deleuze’s discussion of the Rhizome became an intriguing model of thought on which to frame my print practice and this is where I’m going to pause because with Deleuze comes the need to think so here I am, thinking…please wait.



Considering the exhibition closed way back in September 2015 this blog post is one of those better late than never cases. I’d always meant to discover Pace Gallery in London but had never gotten round to it and aiming for the David Zwirner to check out the David Murillo exhibition I literally stumbled across Pace Gallery when I pulled over on the pavement to whack out my tourist map.  Pace Gallery was literally right next to me so I decided to wander in and was delighted to see a solo show by Lee Ufan.

According to the press release; “Lee Ufan’s oeuvre is characterized by thoughtful iterations of gestures in slight variations, engaging in a contemplation of abstract forms and vivid restraint…” (No Author, 2015). En Inglés por favour. Ok, never mind the gallery speak, From Point, From Line, From Wind showcases Ufan’s manipulation of the brush building the most intellectually beautiful works I have ever encountered.

I encountered this exhibition back when I was working on the plates for the Medis Informacija etchings and upon returning to the studio I became hyper aware of the natural and biotic elements within the etching process. I was at the mercy of the acid when biting the plates and caught in the grip of a Zen state of being; “Space means the infinite… Buddhism teaches that being is possible only because there is also nothingness, and appearance coexists with disappearance.” (Ufan in Munroe, 2011, p.30) Ufan’s process is slow and commanded by materials to enact a liminal space so as things begin to amp up for the degree show I’ll remind myself of Ufan’s mastery of time. So watch this space or should I say watch this liminal space… who knows what will happen, only time will tell.


Lee Ufan: From Line, From Point, From Wind (2015) Available at:

Munroe, A. (2011) Stand Still A Moment, Lee Ufan, Marking Infinity. New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications.


I’ve spent most of this morning clearing my busy desktop, both on my computer and my mind. With a clear desktop and clear studio I’ve been reflecting over my recent practice and have enjoyed the digital distance of working on my typewriter as opposed to a screen. Unlike the processor on my laptop my mind can’t keep up with the hyper-speed transmission of data we have become accustomed to (as much as I sometimes wish it could).

When browsing the web and things don’t load properly its recommended you refresh you page, this week I’ve taken the time to refresh the studio and my memory of my recent practice. I’ve become so saturated with ideas and influences my syntax has become saturated by IF_Then conditionals.

‘ Multiple-line syntax:

If condition [ Then ]

[ statements ]

[ ElseIf elseifcondition [ Then ]

[ elseifstatements ] ]

[ Else

[ elsestatements ] ]

End If


‘ Single-line syntax:

If condition Then [ statements ] [ Else [ elsestatements ] ]




Ok, in addition to emptying the studio and starting afresh I decided to think about how I frame my practice and what theory and contextual factors influence my practice. In order to document this process I created a mind map which I have titled; “Google only knows the answer if you  know the question” because if you don’t know what your searching for Google can’t help. In my case I wasn’t sure where I was going for the degree show, but now I have a base to work from, see below for mind map in progress:

Whilst going through the motions of refreshing I have been afforded the opportunity to reflect on my practice from the past few months. I look forward to the next few months and seeing how my practice goes through the motions whilst loading the degree show.