0 Comments

It seems ironic to me that over the past few weeks, I feel like I’ve had everything and yet nothing to say. It’s been three weeks since I posted here, at which point I wrote about tying black gags around the mouths of assorted ceramic figurines. The figurines were all female – innocent and child-like in their appearances – pretty, essentially – to be ‘seen but not heard.’

I had a vague sense of what it meant when I was carrying out the physical act of tying on the gags – ie. in response to the stop domestic violence posters I’d seen in the local area in the lead up to Christmas – but it’s taken time to understand the full significance of why I did what I did.

Retrospectively, I realise that so much of what I wrote about gagging and keeping quiet was symbolic of the way I’d been feeling; the physical act of literally shutting up the figurines was a strong personal statement and is a classic example of how much my emotional life impacts on what I make. Through quite literally shutting the mouths of the figurines and keeping them quiet, I was acting out a desire to stay quiet myself, albeit unconsciously at the time.

That’s the crux of it for me, really – it’s a recurring theme when writing this blog – what to say, versus what not to; what’s important and what isn’t. Certainly, there have been times when, through keeping one eye on the ball of what’s happening in the big wide world out there, I’ve felt that what I have to say just pales into insignificance – and I’ve always been conscious of not wanting to navel gaze, to engage in ‘excessive introspection, self-absorption, or concentration on a single issue.‘ Reminding myself of the recent UK floods, what’s happening in Ukraine at this very moment in time for example, is all part of my desire to keep an eye on the bigger picture, to ultimately keep a perspective on real life, as a practising artist.

Every so often, things seem to stand still and a nagging inner voice forces me to take stock of things, to check in with how I’m really feeling – the life/work/family balance and how to sustain being an artist, in every sense of the word. I haven’t felt particularly inspired in the studio recently, but I’m learning through experience to anticipate these rather barren periods, to accept them and to manage them as effectively as possible – hanging on in there, keeping the faith and so on.

There’s no doubt that it’s infinitely easier to write here when work is being made, focusing more on the process rather than writing about vague, abstract ideas around it.

But creativity, I’m learning, can’t just be turned on like a tap – there are peaks and troughs in even the most successful creative practices. But the mantra ‘just do it’ is one I always seem to return to and do my best to act on – because, however uninspired I might feel, however inadequate, bored, uncertain – it’s the doing it, making the work – that’s important. Back to the studio then, I suppose – fired up at least, with a new idea to experiment and play with.


0 Comments

If it’s true what they say about art imitating life, then the things I’ve been thinking about and experiencing this past week or so all feel pretty timely. The gagging law was passed last Monday evening in the House of Lords. It feels like another nail in the coffin in terms of democracy and I’m concerned about what it means for the future of this country – so many of our rights being eroded away.

Issues around freedom of speech and information sharing have always been important to me – it’s something that often comes up when writing this blog. Though I aspire to edit as little as possible, I’m still conscious of how what I say might affect other people.

And so; how much to reveal versus what to keep to myself – that ongoing tension between privacy and openness – is an ongoing issue. It’s a subject commonly written about here by other artist/bloggers and certainly, I’ve written about and entered into conversations about it on a number of occasions.

It’s manifested itself in my work recently. Last week – the day after the gagging law had been passed in the House of Lords, in fact – I refound some figurines in the studio. In the week leading up to the Christmas break, I tied black ribbons around the mouths of several female ceramic figurines – gagging them, silencing them, putting them in their place – ie. seen but not heard.

The contrast of the black gags against the delicate porcelain, facial features of the figurines was striking and, much like the anti-domestic violence campaign posters that inspired the work, the visual impact stayed with me. The posters put out by the local council in the lead up to Christmas, featured images of a woman’s face; terrified looking eyes, with a hand clamped firmly over her mouth – silenced by a bully. (Of course, we don’t need to think back too far to remember a similar image splashed across our national newspapers).

Even when you’re not particularly conscious of why you’re making certain work, there’s nearly always a reason behind it. The whole issue of silencing (and gagging) has become pertinent for me over the past few weeks as I’ve taken a more thorough, systematic approach to unpacking the boxes in my studio. As I reacquaint myself with a lot of remnants from my past, be it a scrap of fabric, an item of clothing, a photograph, a letter, a trinket, a piece of jewellry, I’m acutely aware of the multitude of emotions contained in a lot of these objects – sadness, grief, joy, happiness; a plethora of feelings, some welcomed, some not. And some easy to write and talk about, and some not.

It’s complicated of course, by the fact that my studio is in an open space – no doors to provide privacy and protection from the public gaze. Some work needs time to develop; I need time to process it properly, to protect the work until I feel it’s ready for public release. Privacy is something I increasingly feel I need, but given my current studio environment as it is – exposed and public – how much of the associative narrative do I feel the need (or even, want) to relay, in any case – bearing in mind, that so much of the material I use in my work comes from such a personal place.

Some issues just deserve a dignified silence. And anyway, aren’t some things, some times, just best left unsaid …?


0 Comments

I made it into the studio this week – finally! Virus behind me, sons’ exams over – a clear day for myself and nine solid, solitary hours of sorting and rearranging. Just a few stray bits and pieces piled up in one part of the studio, but overall, the floor space is clear and a lot of stuff has been put back into some sort of order. My desk is tidy, bar a couple of items I left placed on it – seeds of new ideas for work to come, perhaps?

Whether the end of this massive clear up signals the start of developing new work remains to be seen but whatever, I’m already looking forward to finding the time to get back into the studio, to start playing and experimenting with the rediscovered objects, and see where that might lead. I have no idea which direction my work might take me in this coming year. Scary, but sort of liberating at the same time – I have in any case, numerous pieces of unfinished work to revisit and make decisions about.

But for now, a quote that the Artists Talking editors took from my last post and put on Twitter has got me thinking: ‘The Beginning of History’ exhibition ended in early December; this somehow though, feels like the beginning for me.’ Faced with it, I had to think about what I meant when I wrote that.

One particular piece of work, Here Today, which I created especially for The Beginning of History, made a big impact on me – stirred something deep in me which needed to be processed. Maybe it’s this that made me feel I was at the start of something new, right at the end of the show – something to give more thought to and develop further? My thoughts have kept returning to this particular piece of work – what made it stand out for me?

I remember my response to first producing it in the studio – one of those defining moments when everything seemed to come together and felt ‘just right.’ To my eyes, it seemed that all four selected items sat beautifully together and the visual effect as far as I was concerned, was so aesthetically appealing that it made my heart sing. I’ve been thinking about it a lot – that moment, when for whatever reason, I felt I’d created something that for me personally, was special.

On reflection, I feel that in ‘Here Today‘ I captured something that gets to the very core of my practice – the part that motivates me and keeps me interested and hooked into the work I make. I describe it in my artist statement as my work reflecting ‘… a fascination with the passage of time and the contrast between the permanence of objects and the fragility of life.’

It was the emotional connection to the objects that touched and moved me. Such intimate and highly personal objects, still here, physically present – in the flesh, as it were – while the hands that touched and used them, left their trace on them, no longer exist. ‘The permanence of objects‘ – the mirror, the powder, the make-up, the faded silk flower – and the powder puff, especially for me, so reminiscent of the skin itself – recollections of precious moments spent with Nana at her dressing table.

These physical objects, however battered and used, essentially all still exist, while the woman whose life was so intrinsically involved in using them, no longer does – that fine line ‘between the permanence of objects and the fragility of life.


0 Comments

The viral infection I’ve had recently has left me feeling quite depleted; I still haven’t managed to get to the studio to address the dire mess it’s in and I’ve had to let go of fulfilling any of the projects I had anticipated starting for the new year. Getting better has been a priority and I’ve taken advantage of quiet days at home to catch up with reading, writing and sorting through images of my recent work – and in particular, the images I took of Here Today, exhibited as part of The Beginning of History group show. This particular piece was created specifically for the show and developed from a conversation between myself, Nick Kaplony, the show’s curator, and Shelley Rae, another of the artists in The Beginning of History exhibition.

It was while speaking with Nick and Shelley about my proposal some weeks prior to the start of the show, that a conversation emerged about how much like a performance piece my work seemed. There was something visually captivating, I suppose about presenting them with the various physical objects I intended to use as part of an assemblage – the placing of them, the swapping and changing, as I talked my ideas through with them – trying to make up my mind about what to leave on the bedside cabinet and what to take away – a kind of ongoing, recurring dance.

It’s not the first time that performance art has been mentioned in relation to my work – certainly, I remember a choreographer I know speaking about there being strong elements of it entrenched in my 10×10 project. It’s an observation that intrigues and excites me – it adds a new dimension to the way I think about my work.

I was delighted to take up Nick’s suggestion that I experiment in interacting with Here Today during the show’s two week duration and I subsequently named the work in accordance with the idea of a here today, gone tomorrow principle.

My studio is in the same building as the ASC studios Bond House project space, where The Beginning of History was shown and being in such close proximity meant being able to visit the exhibition on an almost daily basis, allowing me to really immerse myself in both my own work and the other artists’. It felt like the perfect set-up for me – giving me the time and space to properly experiment with the various objects I was working with.

As it turned out, interacting with the work once it was in situ proved to be a rewarding and worthwhile experience. It reminded me how much I enjoy the actual process of installing – especially when it can be done at my own pace, unhurried and with space for thought and consideration about the surrounding environment. And because of the emotional attachment to the items I chose to include in this particular assemblage, it felt good to have the time to treat them with the respect I felt they deserved. Nick’s sensitive and intuitive approach to curating picked up on the personal significance of the items I brought to the show, describing my work as constructing ‘assemblages from found or inherited items wth profound associations to loved ones …’

He also acknowledged the significance of the arranging and placing process: ‘The process of arranging her materials is as significant as any resolved configuration and over the period of the show Murdoch’s work will swell and ebb within the space.’

It happens very rarely for me, so it’s lovely when someone else writes about my work – and even more so when there’s a sense that they just ‘get it’ – understand what the work is about and specifically for me, have a genuine interest in the history behind it. The Beginning of History exhibition ended in early December, 2013; this somehow though, feels like the beginning for me. It was such an amazing group show to be a part of and there’s still a lot to process, I feel.


0 Comments

Back with more to say it seems, already feeling that I’m reaping the benefits of a return to blogging. When a busy family life and illness conspires to keep you out of the studio, it feels good to maintain some sort of connection; it’s what I use this blog for most, I think – like a kind of hello from the sidelines.

Comments left by other artists in response to my blog mean a lot to me – often kind, considered and just plain friendly, they can act as a real source of comfort and yet simultaneously, throw up all sorts of questions and alternative ways of seeing and thinking. It’s very easy for thoughts to stagnate when working in a vacuum and I’m reminded once again of the many advantages of blogging; writing here is as much about connections and community as it is about self-promotion.

The comments left on my blog for this particular week have got me thinking about the sorting process.

Why I do it is clear. The sorting is an integral part of my practice and a necessary process to go through in order to unearth and reacquaint myself with the collected objects and assorted paraphernalia – essentially, the raw material for my work.

How I sort in the studio is another matter …

I’ve been thinking about patterns that are repeated – these intermittent periods, one of which I’m experiencing right now, when I fret about the amount of stuff I have and allow myself to feel completely overwhelmed by the sheer mass of it. I’m talking here about emotional as well as physical mass, of course and am acutely aware of the additional weight of emotional baggage stored away in a lot of the boxes – that’s the overwhelming part for me.

Sitting around worrying about all these things isn’t conducive to getting on with generating work and historically, it’s kept me away from the studio for longer periods than I’d like. Displacement, perhaps? Self-preservation, maybe? Who knows … but recognising the pattern of behaviour at least means that I know the problem isn’t insurmountable – I’ve been here before, and so am aware that the best strategy for overcoming it, is to just get myself back into the studio again – tidy it up and return it to being a space I can work in.

I embraced the chaos of it in the few weeks leading up to the Christmas – like my friend said, it felt like a ‘really alive’ space – but it got too cluttered by the end and I wasn’t able to see the woods for the trees. There’s probably a case for loosening up my control over how orderly I keep my studio space in the future but more about that another time. For now, it’s about getting rid of the worst of the mess and starting to produce work again. New year, new beginnings – I have no idea what it will bring but my hope is that I will stay curious and open to any opportunities sent my way.


0 Comments