0 Comments

Anarchy in the UK

This morning on my way to college suddenly there came on my pod player one Sex Pistols song. As soon as I heard the first line “I am an antichrist, I am an anarchist” I went to the menu and pressed “repeat track.” I kept this song on for the whole day.

By time I arrived at my studio, I took the player off my head and plugged it into my speakers and got on with my painting.

I’d heard of punk rock for the first time about ten years ago, on a sunny day in beautiful Alexandria. My English friend put the Sex Pistols on and although I regarded myself most of my life as a hard rock fan, I had never heard anything like that. No single punk rock track had ever entered the Egyptian market. And as a guy that always thought British music meant Pink Floyd, Sabbath, Motorhead, I freaked out. It was terrible.

Now, as a British citizen and a student at a British art college, and right now, after half a day of the Sex Pistols looping on the speakers echoing in my room as I paint, I admitted to myself that, now, I LOVE the Sex Pistols. Now, and only now, their music makes sense to me.

British art schools often have produced radical bands and radical musicians. Only by studying art here I started to get the point. I often feel a sense that all around me are emotionally disengaged, from each other and from the art that we’re all supposed to be making. But now I understand – making this kind of music was the answer of people who couldn’t do this noise with art.

But I don’t really understand why. I understand that the art students-turned-musicians wanted to take their work to the working class. I want to take my work to the working class too. But why does it have to be music to go to the working class?

“I don’t know what I want, but I know how to get it.”

I wanted to produce a painting that captures the Johnny Rotten energy. I dealt with this painting differently than I usually do: I splashed dirt on it; I spat on it; I hammered it with dry old brushes and I mopped it with the broom that the cleaner left in the corner of the studio.

If I want to be as loud as Rotten, the performance of my painting has to have the same spirit: physical, aggressive, loud and carrying within it total disregard for what’s acceptable, especially for the London audience.

7:30 pm and there seemed to be nobody left in the building. The middle-aged always-angry security guard came to lock up the studios. He walked in to my space as Rotten was still screaming. He looked at my painting. “I love that, man” he said. And he pointed at the speakers with a big smile. “This is the sort of stuff I grew up listening to,” he said. He looked at me and he said “Good man” with a big smile. “I’m here to lock up seeing as what you’re doing I’ll leave you here for a bit.”

Just before leaving the room he looked into the corridor and pointed as though he wanted me to come and look. His smile was gone and the angry, middle aged look was back on his face.I left my painting and went to see what he was pointing out. I found two of the students putting an enormous cardboard box in the middle of the corridor. It was full of garbage and they were arranging it.

“Do you think that’s enough, or should we put more rubbish?” one of them asked. Her friend said warmly, “No, it’s fantastic like this.”

The security guard and I looked at one another wordlessly.

It was time for me to leave. I switched Johnny Rotten off.

On the bus home I felt like I could do with a less angry song to help me on my trip home, and that’s when I discovered that, in my shock at the cardboard box, I had forgotten my headphones in the studio.

God save the Queen.


0 Comments

PRECIOUS

While I am was hanging my first paintings on the wall, I asked one of my colleagues to help me, which she did. We stretched the large paper on the wall and I started to nail it using my powerful German staple-gun.

“What I like about you is that you’re not precious about your work,” she said.

I didn’t now what to say at the time, though we talked awhile, for almost half an hour before she left.

But her comment didn’t leave me. What she likes about me is that I am “Not Precious” about my work.

I was troubled about that, because I, and every single person who really knows me, would know that there is nothing more precious to me than my work. But I understand what she meant, when she saw me hammering my painting to the wall with a big piece of German steel.

But let’s think about that for a minute. Painting was a spiritual, sacrificial act much earlier than recognising “art” as a concept. What we regard as “art” is a concept that more or less wasn’t really established before Aristotle. And if you look a the “primitive” practices in which art was rooted you will understand what I mean. Take for example something like the “voodoo-type” doll known in Egypt since the ancient Egyptians as “Fasokha.”

You’ll find that the creation of the fasokha doll is not any Aristotelian mimetic representation, nor is it a manifestation of beauty. The doll is always a representation of a negative, an evil eye, an evil person, evil spirits. And although making the doll involves effort and some level of craft, and takes place within ceremonies, yet it is not an object for preservation. It will be poked with pins and needles and set on fire. Because the whole ritual is about either healing the self or healing others. This includes both the process of making and the process of breaking.

Now, I’m not saying that I’m going to set my work on fire like a fasokha doll, or a Wicker Man. What I am saying is, that my work is often a representation of the dark corners of the soul, and for the soul to heal, this dark corner has got to be exposed to the light.

And the evil or the negative elements that were once lurking within have got to come out into the light and – like the ancient classic vampire story – by exposing it to the light you finish it, and then you get on with living.

That’s what I think Art was meant to do. But my dear colleague and most others in this contemporary art world, was talking about art as a commodity product and the artist as a commercial enterprise. And so then I think that my answer would have to be, “No, I’m not precious.”


0 Comments

CONCERTINA BOOKS

During the last 2 months I have become really involved with book art; I’m really excited about that; it’s like finding a totally new outlet for drawing

I can’t say much about it now as usually I find it really difficult talking about work that I’m still trying to configure

Last week I produced 2 concertina books, which is a really exciting thing for me. I feel that there is a great range of possibilities to what I can do with that.

I don’t know, take a look and tell me


0 Comments

SHOULD I BE OFFENDED??

As I now live and work as a British artist there are many people who don’t know that I came to England in 2002 in the age of 32. Before that I studied and worked in Egypt, that’s where I got the characteristics which define my work from any work (good or bad) you see on a daily basis in Europe, specially England.

I found out that the following lines always pop up in conversations regarding my work, and it goes like this:

x- I really like your work

me- thank you very much.

x- where are you from?

me- Alexandria

x- and where is that?

me- Egypt!

x- ah, but you studied here didn’t you?

me- no, I studied in Egypt

x- Really?!!!

me – really

today i felt that it’s about time that people get to see some of my Egyptian influences, Egyptian artists some of whom I really admire , unfortunately I can not find all of them on line but try these names by following the links

ADEL EL SIWI

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=adel+el+siwi&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

2.ABDUL HADI AL GAZZAR

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdel_Hadi_Al_Gazzar

http://www.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=MXZ&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&resnum=0&q=abdel%20hadi%20el%20gazzar&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi

3. MARGRET NAHKLA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Nakhla

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://lh3.ggpht.com/_SydjxJJN0PY/SkrYJc1_e3I/AAAAAAAACWA/XmmAag7LLAk/IMG_7086.JPG&imgrefurl=http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Lbukp_qHQQMD2YhnxEY3PQ&usg=__pHm_OpgCbIDMYz5IpEJVtV4CgVo=&h=2304&w=3456&sz=264&hl=en&start=1&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=HFnRshsr0jMF4M:&tbnh=100&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmargaret%2Bnakhla%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26tbs%3Disch:1

have a look and tell me what you think


0 Comments

One of the main things that drives me crazy in Britain – well to be precise one of the things that drives me mad in London art environment – is the emotional disengagement and the lack of reaction.

My attempt to cover the walls of the corridor is mainly aiming at attracting emotional engagement and human reaction.

I’m no saying that I’m going to succeed. But as an artist, I need to understand how these people here in London work. I’m not the kind of artist who’s oblivious to the audience; I’m always aware of them even if I don’t like them. If the eyes of the audience are only looking at the artist’s work, without the hearts and minds being engaged with the artist’s work, it’s like both the artist and the work will be like they never existed.

I don’t mean by this that the artist has got to give the audience “what they want” or expect. A few days ago I finished my first painting – it’s 1.8 m high x 5 m wide. Before hanging it in the corridor, I waited for some fellow MA students who were studying on a course that I don’t know, to walk into their classroom right in form of the wall where I was going to hang the painting. I wanted them to pass in front of a white wall and then to hang the painting while they were in the seminar. I then hid behind the glass in my studio, overlooking the whole event, with a cup of coffee in my hand, waiting to see their reaction when they came out of their room, to face a very loud and aggressive painting the like of which I haven’t seen on any wall in my time here at CCA. The painting has a very loud and aggressive use of colour, with a disturbing and unsettling composition. It reflects a state of panic and angst, and there are some disturbing sexual references. It’s coming straight out of the chaos of my unconscious – and yes, it was designed to make people jump.

Well, they came out of their room one after the other, accompanied by their tutor, and they walked past exactly as if the wall was still white. I sat there and watched their eyeballs, their bodies. They just walked – expressing nothing positive, nothing negative, Just nothing. As if the wall was still white.

I found this very troubling personally, since I’ve practised mural painting since 1995 in many different environments, from galleries to shopping malls to high-traffic main roads. I learned to be a “traffic stopper.” At the end of any mural job the artist has got to go and sit on the street corner and watch the traffic slow down as the drivers can’t help themselves but to look at the mural. This relationship that I have established over 15 years of mural painting, this relationship with my audience with my audience just evaporated like white spirit in front of my eyes.

The main question for me now is, did I lose my capability of commanding the eyes of my audience? Or is it the very nature of this audience to pacify commanding work by ignoring it?


0 Comments