0 Comments

25/8/14

Well it’s pouring with rain on a bank holiday Monday afternoon so what better time to update my blog, or attempt to. This time I’m going to write it in Word and try to copy and paste my text in an attempt to avoid losing much of what I write every time I try to update the blog!

I had a long meeting with one of my collaborators, Lynn, the other day. we were discussing a commission we have, but towards the end I wanted to discuss ideas about this collaboration. I think so far that we have been collaborating, but somehow it’s not quite what I think we could be doing…I suppose I mean that I think we should try different methods of collaboration that we haven’t tried before. For example we go to various places together and film and record and perform after discussing what we are aiming to do, or try things out in a more open way, within a roughly defined project. I tend to do the sound aspect, writing songs, recording etc and Lynn does the filming and final editing. It seemed to me that doing things in a different way would at least be worth a try though more time-consuming. The time factor is important. Lynn has already spent ages trying to edit things after I send a sound file to her, trying to get something she is happy with. I think the amount of money I asked for in the bursary to pay her for her time is woefully inadequate, compared to the time she has actually spent. I’ll need to remember this next time (if there is a next time!)
But also I feel that the collaboration is a bit distant in some respects. I do the sound separately, and Lynn does the video and sound editing together, and she feels this is a collaboration because the final work is a collaboration. But I feel that it’s the coming together of two separate bits of work. I suggested perhaps doing some of the editing together, so that the editing becomes more collaborative, and that, for example, it would be useful for Lynn to see the actual sound edit in Final Cut Pro that I have done, rather than just the final wav file being sent to her to work with. In fact I’ve actually not done a very detailed sound edit of any of the collaborative material, because I felt that I would be determining the character of the final work quite a lot if I did that. I don’t think Lynn is very keen on this idea, and thinks that her seeing my sound edit on the timeline isn’t going to be that useful, since anyway the final piece won’t reflect how the edit looks. I’m sure there are many ways of two people working with sound and images though.

I, on the contrary, think this is important, especially in terms of the work I would like us to do at Greenham Common. I’ve been thinking about the way in which the edit timeline is layered like archaeological strata, and I like to think that the sound-editing process is a bit like the layers of time in the earth at the Common, some bits coming up to the surface once in a while through human or natural activity, and then being submerged or buried again. I wondered if Lynn fancied trying to do something similar with the images on the image timeline, but she felt this was probably not that useful. On the contrary, she felt that maybe the images in the edit were like the way in which the visitor comes to Greenham and just sees what is on the surface, and underground is where all sort of intricate and complex layers of time are to be found in a semi-destroyed state.

We decided to devote more time in the project to the Greenham Common work and I want to go there again before the summer ends and it gets dark early. After I do a performance I’ve been rehearsing at the end of this week, I’ll sort out a visit to Greenham to do more photography and sound recording. Then I need to find some time to think of ways in which to make layers of sound which are complex enough to embody the ideas I have. I’m not sure at all what Lynn wants to do there as she wants to go when I’ve pretty much finished my bit of the work. This is a shame I feel, and it could be a question of time and money. I think in future I will work out far better the time that collaborators would spend and ask for the appropriate budget. I could be wrong, but I feel there’s a lot of pressure on Lynn’s time and money.

There has been no reply to my approaches to Orford Ness, so the time due to be spent on that will now be devoted to Greenham. This is a great shame, as we could make really good and interesting work there. Oh well, perhaps another time. Also I would like still to go to Holkham Beach and do something with the geese. I may have to do this on my own, but perhaps I can persuade Lynn to come with me. She feels we should devote the rest of the a-n project to Greenham, but I feel I have a good opportunity here to pay her with whatever is left after Greenham to work with me on something with the geese at Holkham. It will be different from anything we have done before, either individually or together.

Lucy, my voice teacher, has been very supportive all through this collaborative project, and in helping me with other work I am engaged in, and is always trying to push me forward. When we get time, I think a meeting of the three of us would be very useful.


0 Comments

It’s a while since I visited by new collaborations blog, so here is an update.
I’ve had some problems doing my voice exercise due to a medical issue which is giving me a weak voice and a sore throat, so have spent a couple of weeks researching this condition in books and online, investigating some herbal treatments, and getting advice from Lucy my collaborator and voice teacher. Apparently it’s a problem which quite a lot of singers get because of the dynamic breathing excercises they do. The air, when it’s being expelled, pushes up into the abdomen and can push the contents of the stomach up through the oesophagus and then acid gets into your throat and can easily damage the vocal chords, resulting in hoarseness and changes in the voice (for the worse). Not nice……I hope I can solve this problem. I’m surprised as my attempts to do the exercises are hardly dynamic! but it has happened, alas.

Ha ha, well once again I’ve lost lots of text that I wrote while trying to add an image to this post. It’s just totally lost when you try to add a picture and then try to get out of the gallery…..or library? whatever it is called in its confusing way. there must be a better way of organising this software! the stuff I lost was explaining why not much work has been done on this for a few weeks.
The next part of the project is on Greenham Common. I visited a few weeks ago and although I’d done research before I went there, it was hard to tune-in to the place and its history. At first it seems empty……The missile stores are still there but all fenced off with razor wire, I think. The activities of nature, animals and humans constantly obscure and reveal bits of the past and traces of what remains underground or covered by vegetation. I spent ages looking for traces of bomb storage constructions in a wooded area but had to give up in the end! I will try again. However there are some really evocative things which remain of the military presence of UK and US forces over the centuries. For example this fire plane below, which you will find as you wander around.

As I wandered around in the heat (there’s not a lot of shelter on the common itself, though there are some lovely little woods on the periphery) I met a retired gravedigger speaking to one of the rangers in a landrover, so stopped and asked them a few questions. The ranger, a helpful guy called Adrian, sent me links to a really excellent report on preserving the heritage of Greenham Common, very well written and really informative. I read it online yesterday and have printed out sections of it, and identified key sites on the Common I want to revisit on a future trip.
While I was there the Red Arrows team of fighter planes flew over, the sound was amazing, quite sinister somehow, as they looked bright red against the blue sky. but alas by the time I got my recorder out and warmed up they were gone and I’d missed recording them! There must be a lesson here ……..

I’m going to re-read all my notes and printouts now and think how I can somehow in sound (very probably song) and image engage with the processes of revelation and concealment, appearing and disappearing, that are linked to the historical landscape of the Common. There is only so much that you can see there, so in what other ways and other senses can you discover what is there, what it means, or could mean, can sound play a role in this, and how can you suggest or bring back to life what is long past? Could I get something out of thinking about archaeology and its methods? I seem to remember Freud has written something about this…..is it the mystic writing pad or am I totally mistaken? also there’s a lovely bit in Laura U. Marks’ book, the skin of the film , where she writes about excavation and fossils…….I will read and think, maybe do a few sketches in my notebook….even if I don’t draw anything very brilliant I always think working with a pencil and paper helps somehow! I feel like a fossil myself sometimes these days. Perhaps I should go to Greenham Common and be a fossil…..I will think more on this.


0 Comments