0 Comments

I’ve been thinking about the disposable and temporary, transient and ephemeral. Something to do with watching Douglas Coupland’s lecture at the Memory Marathon at the Serpentine Gallery last month. Plus some other stuff I’ve been thinking about. I love Doug’s novels, although I bet a few of them feel pretty dated now.

Watch Doug Coupland here

http://thespace.org/items/e00019bj?t=wcdv

Doug talks about how our brains might be “planned” by the content we put into them, people used to think through linear narratives, like books, now we think like the internet, non-linear, spidering from link to link and outsource our memories to the cloud of information available on devices. i.e., he doesn’t need to remember telephone numbers anymore, because the cloud holds them, so he can use that brain space for thinking about stuff (world peace).

After listening to Doug I started thinking about the feeling that everything is happening at once that occurs when you are exposed to the infinite information of the cloud. Without the perspective of living too much in the pre-internet age I have to surmise that the rapidity, or rather the instantaneousness, of the cloud means that you have the potential to know everything there is to know all at once, if only you had the brainpower (and the bandwidth) to do it. So we are living in an age of a-temporality. As Doug says, “all fashions seem to exist at once at the moment” he might be right, and it’s an interesting thought.

It made me think of post-modernity. Maybe because here at the end of the post-modern era everything has the same value, high and low, old and new, this might chime with the age of the cloud where everything is available at once. The internet behaves as a place without hierarchy when you interact with it (roughly speaking) and no class of culture or information (even incorrect information if those Sandy pictures tells us anything) has a higher or lower status. So if everything is on a level playing field what do you do next? Start creating your own hierarchies and orders? Yours would be different from mine, how democratic is that. Yet perhaps this is why there are no major political movements or artistic movements to speak of. (I’m putting Occupy to one side for the moment because I think it is a different type of beast)

If everyone curates their own hierarchies of interest, information, cause and belief, how would we get sufficient of us together whose priorities match up to start a movement, or a revolution?

Wanna start a revolution with me?


0 Comments

‘Saatchi paints a scathing picture of the contemporary art world and says that being a buyer these days “is comprehensively and indisputably vulgar”.

He says: “It is the sport of the Eurotrashy, hedgefundy, Hamptonites; of trendy oligarchs and oiligarchs; and of art dealers with masturbatory levels of self-regard.” Saatchi described the Venice Biennale, scene of the world’s biggest contemporary art jamboree, as a place where these people circulate “in a giddy round of glamour-filled socialising, from one swanky party to another”.’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2011/dec/02…

For those of you thinking “that’s a bit bloody rich coming from him” join the club. However, Saatchi’s is just one in a series of articles and polemics condemning the megabux world of contemporary art (that’s the bit of it that we all look at from a great distance, and wonder what the hell it has to do with us)

What’s going on? It just isn’t cool to spend millions of ill gotten gains on art and manipulate and scheme your way to more millions any more. Like the world of investment banking, and the lifestyles of the super-rich everywhere, it is monstrously out of touch and crucially out-of-step with the rest of the world.

Art just isn’t cool anymore, whatcha gonna do?

http://standpointmag.co.uk/node/4683/full

“They’re in the hedge fund business, so they drop their windfall profits into art. It’s just not serious,” he told the Observer. “Art editors and critics – people like me – have become a courtier class. All we do is wander around the palace and advise very rich people. It’s not worth my time.” Dave Hickey

http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2012/oct/28…

The self-fulfilling self-perpetuating fluff of the art world, art consultants, critics, curators, journalists, innumerable administrators and marketeers, manipulators and pundits are a mirror of the accreted ‘services” of every part of the bloated consumer-based world. In banking, in business, in property, in the public sector and in the arts these layers of belief in a market are what give it it’s momentum. Why did no one say anything about all of this before? Collective belief.

I was having a friendly little argument recently with painter Joss Cole, he’s a fiercely intelligent man but a little more idealistic than me, and we were attempting to identify the next movement in art, or certainly ferret out some clues about the shape of it. Post-Internet was mooted although this now seems dated, and Cynical Post-Internet, or what about Post-Consumerist? Post-Object?

It occurred to me that you can only really identify a movement strongly in retrospect, Joss disputed this, but I think it is certainly true nowadays. For this reason; who are you rebelling against? Whose work or attitude are you turning over? The contemporary art machine is voracious and is fashion-led, fashions change remarkably quickly, so you can see yourself on the rebellious fringes looking in one moment, and a month or two later be toast of the town, a month or two after that and you are part of the establishment.

Contemporary Art has to remain cool, it has to have the latest thing, just as the fashion industry sees hemlines and trouser shapes change at least twice a year, if you aren’t ahead of the curve you are behind it, and that ain’t cool.

Still, cheer up contemporary art world, painting died and came back to life, so can you.

More links:

Hari Kunzru dissects Damien Hirst

http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2012/mar/16…

Sarah Thornton’s 10 reasons to quit writing about the art market

http://blogs.artinfo.com/abovetheestimate/2012/10/…

Edited: And from the mouths of oligarchs

http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/its-not-…


0 Comments